Bother bennerv instead of mjudeikis when failing codeql analysis cron #4072
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bennerv
requested review from
jewzaam,
hawkowl,
rogbas,
petrkotas,
jharrington22,
cblecker,
cadenmarchese,
UlrichSchlueter,
SudoBrendan,
yjst2012,
jaitaiwan,
anshulvermapatel,
hlipsig,
mociarain,
kimorris27,
tsatam,
bitoku,
fahlmant and
sankur-codes
as code owners
tsatam
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Fixes #4051
What this PR does / why we need it:
Apparently the last person to modify the
cronon a scheduled job gets notified about failures. So instead of bothering someone else who no longer is here, we'll bother myself :old-man-yells-at-ben: 🤷Test plan for issue:
Watch the thing notify me when it fails
Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?
nope
How do you know this will function as expected in production?
N/a