Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Device Update for IoT Hub swagger changes from SDK client library review. #19492

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 1, 2022
Merged

Device Update for IoT Hub swagger changes from SDK client library review. #19492

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 1, 2022

Conversation

dpokluda
Copy link
Contributor

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify: Incorporating SDK client library feedback; no change to actual service version methods
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. July 2022
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month. June 2022
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@dpokluda dpokluda requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2022 00:57
@dpokluda dpokluda requested review from BlackRider97 and weidongxu-microsoft and removed request for a team June 17, 2022 00:57
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @dpokluda Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 17, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 13 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.6)] new version base version
    deviceupdate.json 2022-07-01(ba91ceb) 2022-07-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'LogCollectionOperation' removed or renamed?
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2295:3
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2286:3
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_GetGroupUpdateCompliance' to 'DeviceManagement_GetUpdateComplianceForGroup'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1126:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1125:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_GetDeviceClassSubgroupDetails' to 'DeviceManagement_GetDeviceClassSubgroup'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1486:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1481:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_ListBestUpdatesForDeviceClassSubgroup' to 'DeviceManagement_GetBestUpdatesForDeviceClassSubgroup'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1607:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1602:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_DeleteDeviceClassSubgroupDeployment' to 'DeviceManagement_DeleteDeploymentForDeviceClassSubgroup'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1746:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1740:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_ListDevicesForDeviceClassSubgroupDeployment' to 'DeviceManagement_ListDeviceStatesForDeviceClassSubgroupDeployment'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1923:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L1917:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_CollectLogs' to 'DeviceManagement_StartLogCollection'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2085:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2079:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_GetLogCollectionOperation' to 'DeviceManagement_GetLogCollection'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2131:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2125:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_ListLogCollectionOperations' to 'DeviceManagement_ListLogCollections'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2170:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2164:7
    1008 - ModifiedOperationId The operation id has been changed from 'DeviceManagement_GetLogCollectionOperationDetailedStatus' to 'DeviceManagement_GetLogCollectionDetailedStatus'. This will impact generated code.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2209:7
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2203:7
    1009 - RemovedRequiredParameter The required parameter 'logCollectionRequest' was removed in the new version.
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2100:11
    1010 - AddingRequiredParameter The required parameter 'logCollection' was added in the new version.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2106:11
    1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format than the previous one.
    New: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L4356:5
    Old: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L4331:5
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️❌LintDiff: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-07-01-preview package-2022-07-01-preview(ba91ceb) package-2022-07-01-preview(main)

    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    Rule Message
    R2003 - ValidFormats 'url' is not a known format.
    Location: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L4360


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ R2001 - AvoidNestedProperties Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience
    Location: Microsoft.DeviceUpdate/preview/2022-07-01-preview/deviceupdate.json#L2696
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️⚠️SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

    |:speech_balloon: |"readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.11.0 -> 1.11.0)"|
    |:speech_balloon: |"readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.11.0->1.11.0)"|
    |:speech_balloon: |"readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.21.4 -> 4.21.4)"|
    |:speech_balloon: |"readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@autorest/modelerfour' (4.21.4->4.21.4)"|
    |:speech_balloon: |"readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"Autorest completed in 11.76s. 0 files generated."|


    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ⚠️ DeprecatedConfig "readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"Using directive.0.suppress which is deprecated and will be removed in the future."
    💬 "readme":"deviceupdate/data-plane/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-07-01-preview",
    "details":"AutoRest core version selected from configuration: ^3.2.0."
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 17, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from b9b9192. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]  global `--global`, `--local` are deprecated. Use `--location=global` instead.
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	No package detected after generation
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from b9b9192. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️azure-iot-deviceupdate [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from b9b9192. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] deprecated [email protected]: The functionality that this package provided is now in @npmcli/arborist
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARN deprecated [email protected]: Please upgrade  to version 7 or higher.  Older versions may use Math.random() in certain circumstances, which is known to be problematic.  See https://v8.dev/blog/math-random for details.
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN deprecated @opentelemetry/[email protected]: Package renamed to @opentelemetry/api, see https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh]  WARN deprecated @azure/[email protected]: This version has been deprecated, please upgrade to the version tagged as latest
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] npm WARN @octokit/[email protected] requires a peer of @octokit/core@>=3 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/device-update [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      error	breakingChangeTracking is enabled, but version or changelogItem is not found in output.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dpokluda, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @dpokluda, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @weidongxu-microsoft
    Copy link
    Member

    Please do not modify package-lock.json in PR

    …orty; removing to fix Linux filename casing issue).
    Copy link
    Member

    @weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    So far, no REST API change.

    SDK in preview, so we can do breaking changes to SDK.

    }

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    ideally this file should not be in commit.

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    How do I remove it from the commit? I reverted the changes I made.

    Copy link
    Member

    @weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft Jun 29, 2022

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    git checkout main -- package-lock.json
    

    then double check and commit the change, push. That should make it exactly same as main, and it should disappear from the PR.

    Copy link
    Member

    @mikekistler mikekistler left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    There was a terminology issue raised in the SDK Arch Board review that seems to originate in the path structure of the REST API.

    There are two "collections" (static path segments) that both use "deviceClassId" as the id:

    • deviceClasses
    • deviceClassSubgroups

    If these are truly two distinct collections, they should have distinct ids. Conversely, if these are two different names for the same collection, then you should pick one name and use it consistently.

    @dpokluda
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @mikekistler, the concepts are same but the two (device-class at the global level and device-class-subgroup at the group level represent slightly different set of devices). I have sent you a detailed e-mail describing the two concepts and their differences.

    Copy link
    Member

    @lmazuel lmazuel left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Approving that the content is valid Swagger and makes to me, I'm not judging the accuracy of the rename since I was not in archboard

    @lmazuel
    Copy link
    Member

    lmazuel commented Jul 1, 2022

    @mikekistler I was told by @dpokluda that your "request-changes" was actually just a comment, therefore I'm ignoring it and merging to allow David to more forward. If you have concerns let me know. Thanks!

    @mikekistler
    Copy link
    Member

    @lmazuel I must have pushed request changes by mistake. It is correct that this was just a comment. And I can't seem to undo it now so leaving this comment here "for the record".

    @dpokluda dpokluda deleted the sdk-review-feedback branch July 8, 2022 22:31
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants