Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Maulik/mfe stable changes #20373

Conversation

Maulik003
Copy link
Contributor

@Maulik003 Maulik003 commented Aug 24, 2022

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

rejoron and others added 30 commits August 8, 2022 10:50
* Updating Microsoft.Security\Pricing API Documentation

* Adding items property to replacedBy
…eration ID Prefix (Azure#20106)

This means that when grouped these are grouped by Type (Certificate, IotDpsResource) rather than by GET/PUT/PATCH etc which is less useful.
Co-authored-by: Zhenbiao Wei (WICRESOFT NORTH AMERICA LTD) <[email protected]>
…properties in data encryption (Azure#19910)

* fix name error

* fix example

* fix example

* fix properties error
* Add more scopes

* update documentation

* fix some wording

* wording

* fix artifact name

* fix comment

* fix title

* rename files
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Sql from version preview/2021-11-01-preview to version 2021-11-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* add the latest generated stable 2021-11-01

* update readme.md with latest stable api list

* update swaggers

* update swagger format

* address lintdiff pipeline

* address lint error

* add           "x-ms-identifiers": []
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.BotService from version preview/2021-05-01-preview to version 2022-06-15-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* add email related and outlook

* Update readme

* Correct some elements

* fix model issue

* Fix prettier issues.

* add QnAMakerEndpointKeys api

* fix the prettierCheck

Co-authored-by: hualxie <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chang Liu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hongyang Du <[email protected]>
* Fix error response schema for the ListCustomHostNameAnalysis API

* Wrong place
* Full copy from 2021-09-01 to 2022-05-01 without any changes

* Updating API version for Service types, Updating readme files

* Feature: add directoryServiceOptions AADKERB

* Add AADKERB to list of custom words

* Fix default version tag in readme.md

* Make encryption keySource optional

* Fix lint: add missing x-ms-enum

* Fix x-ms-enum at wrong level

* Make some activeDirectoryProperties optional

* Update readme.python.md

Co-authored-by: Yuchao Yan <[email protected]>
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Peering from version stable/2022-01-01 to version 2022-06-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Updated Peering API version 2022-06-01

* Fixed slight issue with Peering readme

* Updated resource path for POST ValidateRegisteredPrefix

Co-authored-by: jsaraco <[email protected]>
…2-09-01-preview (Azure#19889)

* Adds base for updating Creator from version preview/2.0 to version 2022-09-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add swagger doc with version '2022-09-01-preview' for styling service

* update sharedKey description

* resolve some comments and couple validation errors

* Fix more model issues

* Fix more model validations

* Fix LintDiff

* Fix validation errors

* Fix lintDiff
…ble/2022-08-01 (Azure#19891)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Media from version stable/2021-11-01 to version 2022-08-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* remove unrelated changes

* delete unrelated examples

* make changes to 2022-08-01 streamingservice

* fix comments

Co-authored-by: Stephanie Han <[email protected]>
…zure#20157)

* change the name of a new enumeration

* revert changes in python readme

* add directive to mitigate go sdk breaking change

Co-authored-by: Chenjie Shi <[email protected]>
…review/2022-04-30-preview (Azure#18743)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Devices from version preview/2021-07-02-preview to version 2022-04-30-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add RoutingCosmosDBCollectionProperties to iothub.json.

* Update naming.

* Fix enum.

* Unique x-ms-enum names.

* Use same name for same enum def.

* Revert "Use same name for same enum def."

This reverts commit 6279e70.

* Use same name for enum.

* Revert "Use same name for enum."

This reverts commit 366c4b3.

* Adds suppression to readme

* Revert "Revert "Use same name for enum.""

This reverts commit 15b8dc9.

* Update reason on UniqueXmsEnumName suppression.

* Ensure camel casing on partitionKeyName and partitionKeyTemplate.

* Add 'deviceid' to custom-words.txt.

* Add x-ms-secret.

* Remove secret tag for storage endpoint connection string.

* Adding the change for rootCertificateV2

* typo

* fixing validation error

* Update error response schema

* fixing tag

* adding Azure-AsyncOperation as header

* fix: adding Azure-AsyncOperation as header

* Fix semantic error

* header fix

* adding x-ms-identifiers

* fix

* fix

* prettier fix

* Azure-Async header position testing

* re-trigger stuck queue validation jobs

* revert change

* testing Azure AsyncOperation header

* Adding Azure-AsyncOperation to other possible place to mitigate the error

* make small change to retrigger the check queue

* Adding Async Operation header to the examples.

* fix format

* Typo fix

* revert the change of error details schema

* Revert unwanted changes

Co-authored-by: Jared Wilson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Chris Huang <[email protected]>
Updating the CODEOWNERS for Cosmos related PRs on request of Cosmos team.
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.SecurityInsights from version preview/2022-07-01-preview to version 2022-08-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Added file imports (Azure#19678)

* added file imports

* .

* .

* version

* fix delete response (Azure#20154)

* fix delete response

* example fix

Co-authored-by: Moran Raz Mizrahi <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: moranraz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Moran Raz Mizrahi <[email protected]>
Customize secretmanagementtestsvc pr assignment.
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.LabServices from version preview/2021-11-15-preview to version 2022-08-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* refactor: update the v2022-08-01 specifications

* Fix prettier issues

* Add missing clouderror.json file

* Add missing xmsidentifier clouderror property

* Add x-ms-identifiers to Skus.json file

* Resolve code style issues in clouderror.json

* Add clouderror to custom-words.txt

* Use ErrorResponse instead of CloudError

* Fix duration format in examples

* Fix duration format in Users examples

* Fix duration format in LabPlans examples
* patch now 3

* patch now 4

* patch now 5

* test encoding

* test encoding

* doc abs req

* text sum

* conv

* example

* BOM

* revert

* add timing

* add missing parent

* custom api

* more descriptions

* add more required fields

* add custom task and result

* add more description to summary controls

* fix base class bug, add lab features, ext phrase c

* add CustomAbstractiveSummarizationLROResults

* add examples

* auth example

* remove dup

* require storage

* remove invalid example, rename item id

* fix example

* add more description

* fix invalid char in example, unify enum value

* remove customization

* fix example

* revert ext sum, denorm conv

* fix typo

* 10

* spec

* revert

* remove lab features, rename timing, narrative

* fix examples

* merge upstream

* Revert "merge upstream"

This reverts commit 07fc9c6.

* fetch upstream

* common ver

* get 07-01 back to readme

* revert changes to extractive summarization

* prettier

* add word

Co-authored-by: Yuantao Wang <[email protected]>
@raosuhas
Copy link

Seems like this PR is created in correctly can you please abandon and recreate ?

@raosuhas raosuhas added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Aug 31, 2022
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Please ensure to respond feedbacks from the ARM API reviewer. When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove ARMChangesRequested

@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Aug 31, 2022
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Aug 31, 2022
@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Aug 31, 2022
@Maulik003 Maulik003 closed this Aug 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.