Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

graphrbac - updating folder structure to be more consistent #4776

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor

Adding a folder to graphrbac to be more consistent with the rest of the repo, this helps supporting the service in OpenAPIHub - https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/app/branch/veronicagg/azure-rest-api-specs/graphrbac-fix-folder

@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#3971

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#589

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-ruby#1958

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Nothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#4202

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Dec 5, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-java#2338

@veronicagg veronicagg changed the title updating folder structure to be more consistent graphrbac - updating folder structure to be more consistent Dec 5, 2018
@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

nschonni commented Dec 5, 2018

Should it be Microsoft.GraphRbac instead of the plain GraphRbac?

@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nschonni good question, since this is not the name of the resource provider, I thought of adding a folder that's just a plain name to make that more obvious.
@salameer @billytrend thoughts?

@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ok, decided to update it, thanks!

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

nschonni commented Dec 5, 2018

Just to be even more confusing 😉 the C# has Graph.RBAC, so maybe even Microsoft.Graph.Rbac

@veronicagg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nschonni thanks, but I'd prefer to leave it as is :)

@praries880 praries880 merged commit 478a692 into Azure:master Dec 5, 2018
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
* updating folder structure to be more consistent with the rest of the services

* updating file due to not desired automatic formatting

* updating to Microsoft.GraphRbac
mccleanp pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2022
* Remove 202 response from Microsoft.ObjectStore swagger

* Add new API Version 2021-09-01-preview

Add new API Version 2021-09-01-preview

* Update the new version in the swagger spec and examples

* Update ListByResourceGroup.json

* Addressed ARM feedback

* Update objectstore.json

* Update objectstore.json

* Add required properties to Operation

* Minor Fix for example json
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants