Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch Control Plane 2021-06-01 update #22195

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

paterasMSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT commented Jun 25, 2021

Swagger change PR

All SDK Contribution checklist:

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

  • Please open PR in Draft mode if it is:
    • Work in progress or not intended to be merged.
    • Encountering multiple pipeline failures and working on fixes.
  • If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • The pull request does not introduce breaking changes.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

SDK Generation Guidelines

  • The generate.cmd file for the SDK has been updated with the version of AutoRest, as well as the commitid of your swagger spec or link to the swagger spec, used to generate the code. (Track 2 only)
  • The *.csproj and AssemblyInfo.cs files have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.

Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:

Note: Only applies to Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP] or Azure.ResourceManager.[RP]

  • Include updated management metadata.
  • Update AzureRP.props to add/remove version info to maintain up to date API versions.

Management plane SDK Troubleshooting

  • If this is very first SDK for a services and you are adding new service folders directly under /SDK, please add new service label and/or contact assigned reviewer.

  • If the check fails at the Verify Code Generation step, please ensure:

    • Do not modify any code in generated folders.
    • Do not selectively include/remove generated files in the PR.
    • Do use generate.ps1/cmd to generate this PR instead of calling autorest directly.
      Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running generate.ps1. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version.

    Note: We have recently updated the PSH module called by generate.ps1 to emit additional data. This would help reduce/eliminate the Code Verification check error. Please run following command:

      `dotnet msbuild eng/mgmt.proj /t:Util /p:UtilityName=InstallPsModules`
    

Old outstanding PR cleanup

Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.

@ghost ghost added the Batch label Jun 25, 2021
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT changed the title Generated control plane [Draft - Do Not Review] Generated control plane Jun 25, 2021
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT changed the title [Draft - Do Not Review] Generated control plane [Draft - Do Not Review] Batch Control Plane 2021-06-01 update Jun 25, 2021
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch 8 times, most recently from d2177b5 to 6da7abb Compare July 19, 2021 16:48
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch 3 times, most recently from f026ac7 to d1bd488 Compare July 20, 2021 20:37
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT changed the title [Draft - Do Not Review] Batch Control Plane 2021-06-01 update Batch Control Plane 2021-06-01 update Jul 20, 2021
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT marked this pull request as ready for review July 20, 2021 20:42
@allenjzhang
Copy link
Member

/azp run net - mgmt - ci

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@paterasMSFT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@allenjzhang CI passing now

@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch from 0250d72 to a3572a5 Compare July 21, 2021 17:07
Copy link
Member

@markcowl markcowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some breaking changes here. The changes aoround identity types I think can be easily mitigated by a customization, per the comments.

The breaking change in the constructor for ContainerRegisytry is caused by the way parameters are ordered (optional parameters come after required parameters). I don't think there is an easy mitigation here that is desirable.

@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT enabled auto-merge (squash) July 28, 2021 15:02
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT disabled auto-merge July 29, 2021 13:07
Added generated descriptions.
PR SDK updates

Updated version

sdkinfo
Added markdown config

Ignore MD013

Change log update

Expanded change log.
AutoStorage AuthenticationMode memoery test

Switched to static resource name.

Scenario tests

Added ListOutboundNetworkDependenciesEndpoints test

OsDisk scenario test

Tests AllowedAuthenticationModes

ComputeNodeIdentityReference test
Updated test recordings

Updated recordings

Updated recordings

Updated session records
Fixed breacking change
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch from b1616ec to 5c3dc15 Compare July 29, 2021 13:51
@paterasMSFT
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markcowl could we get an approval here? Time is a factor. Thank you.

Updated generation.
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch from 2afddbb to 6e9d963 Compare July 30, 2021 01:13
Copy link
Member

@markcowl markcowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like you addressecd one breaking change issue, but did not address the other two. Did I miss something?

@paterasMSFT
Copy link
Contributor Author

paterasMSFT commented Jul 30, 2021

@markcowl

still a breaking change - the constructor has removed parameters.

Which parameters have been removed? I still see them all there. The type name is shorter, will the old not be coerced into its parent type?

UPDATE: Tested it, and you're right, I do need a wrapping constructor to facilitate the new type. I'll add one now. (Now done)

Still a breaking change, this class is still removed with no mitigation

The generated one is removed, but I put in a manual one that derives from the newly renamed generated class, as discussed: sdk/batch/Microsoft.Azure.Management.Batch/src/Models/BatchAccountIdentityUserAssignedIdentitiesValue.cs

@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT requested a review from markcowl July 30, 2021 20:47
Fixed version.
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT force-pushed the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch from d580555 to 81f4175 Compare July 30, 2021 22:30
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2021 22:30
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 30, 2021

Hello @markcowl!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT merged commit e655e1f into main Jul 30, 2021
@paterasMSFT paterasMSFT deleted the mipatera/controlplane20210601 branch July 30, 2021 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants