Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JNG-5995 Update eclipse #214

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

robertcsakany
Copy link
Member

@robertcsakany robertcsakany commented Nov 2, 2024

TaskJNG-5995 Update eclipse to 2024-09

JNG-5995 Update eclipse

@robertcsakany robertcsakany force-pushed the feature/JNG-5995_UpdateEclipse branch from e672614 to c34819d Compare November 19, 2024 20:36
@robertcsakany robertcsakany force-pushed the feature/JNG-5995_UpdateEclipse branch from c34819d to 8bf8759 Compare November 25, 2024 03:26
@robertcsakany robertcsakany marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 01:21
@robertcsakany robertcsakany self-assigned this Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve updates to the pom.xml files across multiple projects, focusing on upgrading various dependencies and properties. Key updates include version changes for surefire, slf4j, jackson, and jacoco, along with the introduction of new properties for logback and lombok. Additionally, the version constraints for Spring framework dependencies in the judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms projects have been updated to support versions starting from 4.7.

Changes

File Change Summary
pom.xml - Added properties: logback-version (1.5.12), lombok-version (1.18.34)
- Updated properties: surefire-version (3.0.0-M7 → 3.5.1), slf4j-version (2.0.7 → 2.0.16),
jackson-version (2.16.1 → 2.17.2), jacoco.version (0.8.8 → 0.8.12)
- Updated dependencies: slf4j-api (scope set to provided), logback-classic (version updated to ${logback-version}, scope set to provided), lombok (version updated to ${lombok-version})
judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms-hsqldb/pom.xml - Updated Import-Package versions: org.springframework.jdbc (4,6) → (4,7), org.springframework.transaction (4,6) → (4,7)
judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms-postgresql/pom.xml - Updated Import-Package versions: org.springframework.jdbc (4,6) → (4,7), org.springframework.transaction (4,6) → (4,7)
judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms/pom.xml - Updated Import-Package versions: org.springframework.jdbc (4,6) → (4,7), org.springframework.transaction (4,6) → (4,7)

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    participant Dependencies

    User->>System: Request to build project
    System->>Dependencies: Check for updated versions
    Dependencies-->>System: Provide updated versions
    System->>Dependencies: Apply new versions
    System-->>User: Build completed with updated dependencies
Loading

🐇 "In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
Versions updated, as fresh as can be!
Logback and Lombok, a delightful pair,
With every change, we dance in the air!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For our project’s future is bright and clear!" 🥕

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@robertcsakany has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16c84c8 and 6415278.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16c84c8 and 6415278.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pom.xml (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pom.xml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 838877e and 16c84c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms-hsqldb/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms-postgresql/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • judo-runtime-core-dao-rdbms/pom.xml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +27 to +28
org.springframework.jdbc*;version="[4,7)",
org.springframework.transaction*;version="[4,7)",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Version range expansion requires Spring framework upgrade

The current configuration shows a significant version mismatch:

  • Spring framework version is locked to 4.3.12.RELEASE in dependencies
  • OSGi Import-Package allows versions up to 7.0.0
  • Spring Boot is on version 2.7.0

This indicates that while the OSGi bundle is prepared to accept Spring 6.x dependencies, the actual Spring framework version used in the project is much older (4.3.12). The version range expansion in OSGi imports alone is insufficient; a coordinated upgrade of Spring framework is needed first.

  • The Spring framework version needs to be upgraded from 4.3.12.RELEASE in the root pom.xml
  • Spring Boot version (2.7.0) should also be evaluated as it may not be compatible with Spring framework 6.x
  • All modules importing Spring packages should be tested with the new versions
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Spring framework compatibility with Eclipse 2024-09

The version range for Spring framework packages has been expanded from [4,6) to [4,7). While this change allows for newer Spring versions, we should ensure:

  1. This aligns with Eclipse 2024-09 requirements
  2. The application has been tested with Spring 6.x versions
  3. All Spring framework dependencies are consistently updated across the project

Let's verify the Spring framework version consistency:

Consider documenting the rationale for this version range expansion in the PR description or codebase documentation. This will help future maintainers understand the relationship between Eclipse 2024-09 and Spring framework version requirements.


Let me gather more information about the Spring version configuration in the dependencies.

This will help us understand:

  1. The configured Spring version across the project
  2. Spring Boot version constraints
  3. How the dependencies are managed across modules
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Spring framework version ranges across all POM files
echo "Checking Spring framework version ranges in Import-Package sections:"
rg -A 2 'org\.springframework\.(jdbc|transaction)\*;version=' --type xml

echo -e "\nChecking direct Spring framework dependency versions:"
rg '<artifactId>spring-[^<]+</artifactId>' -A 1 --type xml

Length of output: 3874


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Spring version property definition and its usage
echo "Checking Spring version property definition:"
rg '<spring-version>' -B 2 -A 2 --type xml

echo -e "\nChecking Spring Boot parent version:"
rg '<spring-boot.*version>' -B 2 -A 2 --type xml

echo -e "\nChecking parent POM references:"
rg '<artifactId>judo-runtime-core-dependencies</artifactId>' -B 1 -A 2 --type xml

Length of output: 9052

Comment on lines +31 to +32
org.springframework.jdbc*;version="[4,7)",
org.springframework.transaction*;version="[4,7)",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Potential version compatibility issue detected

The version range expansion in the OSGi Import-Package directive ([4,7)) appears inconsistent with the actual Spring Framework version used in the project (4.3.12.RELEASE). This could lead to runtime issues:

  • The project uses Spring Framework 4.3.12.RELEASE (defined in <spring-version> property)
  • Spring Boot 2.7.0 is used in several modules
  • The Import-Package directive allows versions up to (but not including) 7.0.0
  • While Java 17 is set as the compiler source, which would support newer Spring versions

The version range should be aligned with the actual Spring dependencies used in the project. Consider:

  1. Either updating the Spring Framework version to a newer version
  2. Or constraining the Import-Package version range to match the current Spring version
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify compatibility with expanded Spring Framework version range

The version range for Spring Framework dependencies has been expanded from [4,6) to [4,7), which now includes compatibility with Spring 6.x versions. Please ensure:

  1. The project's Java version is compatible (Spring 6.x requires Java 17+)
  2. All dependent modules and libraries are compatible with Spring 6.x
  3. The rationale for this version range expansion is documented

Let's verify the Java version and related Spring dependencies:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Java version requirement in parent POM
echo "Checking Java version requirement..."
rg -A 2 "<maven.compiler.source|<java.version" 

# Check Spring Framework related dependencies
echo "Checking Spring Framework dependencies..."
rg -A 3 "<artifactId>spring-[^<]*</artifactId>"

# Check if there are any Spring version properties
echo "Checking Spring version properties..."
rg "<spring[^<]*\.version>"

Length of output: 4412


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the spring-version property definition and its value
echo "Checking spring-version property..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "spring-version" --type xml

# Let's also check if there are any Spring Boot parent or dependency management
echo "Checking Spring Boot parent and dependency management..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "spring-boot-(parent|dependencies)" --type xml

# Check the actual Import-Package directives in the bundle plugin
echo "Checking bundle plugin Import-Package directives..."
rg -B 2 -A 5 "<Import-Package>" --type xml

Length of output: 5794

Comment on lines +27 to +28
org.springframework.jdbc*;version="[4,7)",
org.springframework.transaction*;version="[4,7)",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Spring version range expansion needs adjustment

The version range expansion to [4,7) appears inconsistent with the actual Spring framework version used in the project (4.3.12.RELEASE). The current OSGi Import-Package directive allows for compatibility with Spring versions up to 7.x, which is too permissive given that:

  1. The project explicitly uses Spring 4.3.12.RELEASE as defined in <spring-version> property
  2. There's no evidence of Eclipse 2024-09 requiring Spring versions beyond 6.x
  3. Spring 6.x and above have significant breaking changes from 4.x

Recommended actions:

  • Keep the version range as [4,6) or consider a more conservative range like [4,5) to match the actual Spring version in use
  • If Spring version upgrade is planned, it should be done explicitly rather than through loose version constraints
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Spring framework version compatibility with Eclipse 2024-09

The version range for Spring framework packages has been expanded from [4,6) to [4,7). While this allows for greater flexibility, we should ensure:

  1. The expanded range is actually required for Eclipse 2024-09 compatibility
  2. The application has been tested with Spring 6.x versions

Let's verify the Spring framework versions in use across the project:

Consider adding a comment in the POM file documenting why this version range expansion was necessary for the Eclipse 2024-09 upgrade.

 <Import-Package>
     ${osgi-default-import},
+    <!-- Extended to support Eclipse 2024-09 Spring framework versions -->
     org.springframework.jdbc*;version="[4,7)",
     org.springframework.transaction*;version="[4,7)",
     *
 </Import-Package>
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Spring framework version usage and dependencies

# Check for Spring version properties
echo "Checking Spring version properties:"
rg -l "spring.*version" --glob "pom.xml"

# Check for Spring framework dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking Spring framework dependencies:"
rg -A 3 "<groupId>org\.springframework</groupId>" --glob "pom.xml"

# Check for any Spring version constraints in parent poms
echo -e "\nChecking parent pom constraints:"
find . -name "pom.xml" -exec grep -l "<artifactId>spring" {} \;

Length of output: 4243


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the specific Spring version property and any Eclipse-related properties
echo "Checking Spring version property value:"
rg "spring-version|spring\.version" -B2 -A2 --glob "pom.xml"

echo -e "\nChecking Eclipse-related properties and dependencies:"
rg "eclipse" -B2 -A2 --glob "pom.xml"

# Check OSGi Import-Package directives in other modules
echo -e "\nChecking other OSGi Import-Package directives for Spring:"
rg -B2 -A2 "Import-Package.*spring" --glob "pom.xml"

Length of output: 3161

@robertcsakany robertcsakany merged commit 0450cae into develop Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
@robertcsakany robertcsakany deleted the feature/JNG-5995_UpdateEclipse branch November 27, 2024 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants