Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: abstract grid model #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2021
Merged

feat: abstract grid model #233

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2021

Conversation

rouille
Copy link
Collaborator

@rouille rouille commented Mar 9, 2021

Pull Request doc

Purpose

Abstract grid model

What the code is doing

Use the new grid_model entry in the scenario information to access the constants of the grid model.

Testing

All tests pass when the model branch in PowerSimData is checked out

Where to look

everywhere.

Time estimate

20min

@rouille rouille added the grid label Mar 9, 2021
@rouille rouille self-assigned this Mar 9, 2021
@rouille rouille force-pushed the ben/model branch 5 times, most recently from 26fbcb2 to 1bc6913 Compare March 11, 2021 00:39
Copy link
Contributor

@danielolsen danielolsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably want to re-launch the tests using the merged PowerSimData just to be sure, but I'm pretty confident that this is ready to go.

Copy link
Collaborator

@BainanXia BainanXia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@rouille rouille merged commit c3e83e5 into develop Mar 13, 2021
@rouille rouille deleted the ben/model branch March 13, 2021 00:46
@ahurli ahurli mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2021
@rouille rouille changed the title Abstract grid model feat: abstract grid model Mar 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants