-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Renaming sample_infections to compute_future_infections #137
Renaming sample_infections to compute_future_infections #137
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #137 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.24% 92.24%
=======================================
Files 34 34
Lines 683 683
=======================================
Hits 630 630
Misses 53 53
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know the main issue suggested compute_future_infections
but on review I might suggest
compute_infections_from_rt
and
compute_infections_from_rt_with_feedback
Thoughts @gvegayon @damonbayer ?
I like that better. Updating |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing an update to the function name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Renames functions to avoid suggesting stochasticity.