Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: use bigint directly rather than from the fvm #3522

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2023

Conversation

lemmih
Copy link
Contributor

@lemmih lemmih commented Sep 27, 2023

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

  • BigInt isn't an FVM concept. We should use the type directly from the num-bigint crate.

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

@lemmih lemmih marked this pull request as ready for review September 27, 2023 11:56
@lemmih lemmih requested a review from a team as a code owner September 27, 2023 11:56
@lemmih lemmih requested review from ruseinov, jdjaustin and LesnyRumcajs and removed request for a team September 27, 2023 11:56
@lemmih lemmih enabled auto-merge September 27, 2023 11:57
@lemmih lemmih added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 27, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit a7260ee Sep 27, 2023
@lemmih lemmih deleted the lemmih/refactor-bigint branch September 27, 2023 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants