Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use v1.30.0 stable Lotus in CI tests #4970

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

  • use v1.30.0 stable Lotus in CI tests, @LeshyBot can't deal with this at its current capacities.

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 04:02
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2024 04:02
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from ruseinov and elmattic and removed request for a team November 8, 2024 04:02
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
@hanabi1224
Copy link
Contributor

Will @LeshyBot try to revert this change after it's merged?

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Member Author

Will @LeshyBot try to revert this change after it's merged?

It might, but we'll just ignore it. :)

Merged via the queue into main with commit d836516 Nov 8, 2024
39 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the bump-lotus branch November 8, 2024 05:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants