-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix PEP8 errors #248
Fix PEP8 errors #248
Conversation
In addition, it can cause conflicts, which will result in a new vote. |
Nah, that was fixed. |
Oh, you ruined my insidious attack on democracies. 😈 |
@chaosbot , there is no more conflicts. Stop lying. |
It caches that for a little while. It takes a couple minutes to update. |
@@ -2,26 +2,34 @@ | |||
import socketserver | |||
import socket | |||
|
|||
#set the process name to "chaos_server" so we can easily kill it with "pkill chaos_server" | |||
# set the process name to "chaos_server" so we can easily kill it with | |||
# "pkill chaos_server" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of moving this further away from the function it's documenting, it should probably be made into a docstring.
Fixing Python source files for PEP8 compliance is chasing windmills unless some mechanism is in place for checking and/or fixing source files continously. It's hard just to merge PEP8 related fixes, and PEP8 issues will pop up again and again. |
#250 will make it easy enough to cause Chaos to stop redeploying if a linter fails if that's the direction we want to go. |
👍 for linting and checking in the modified source files automatically, if there are changes |
🙆♀️ PR passed with a vote of 11 for and 0 against, with a weighted total of 11.0 and a threshold of 6.2. See merge-commit 551a379 for more details. |
This fixes some of the PEP8 compliance errors.