Fix & Feat Chats Summarizing #3433
Conversation
- [+] fix(chat.ts): fix known issue where summarize is not using the current model selected - [+] feat(chat.ts): add support for user-selected summarizing method
|
another notation Note in scenario while you using custom model e.g, using another ai, simply you can just add model name in custom model, then while summarizing the conversation, it will using that model. |
lloydzhou
added
help wanted
WalkthroughThe function Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Note Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait... Files selected for processing (1)
Tip You can make CodeRabbit's review more strict using the `assertive` profile, if that's what you prefer.Change the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/store/chat.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/store/chat.ts (2)
Line range hint
547-561: Verify the function usage after fixing the logic error.Ensure that the function usage here is correct after the logic error in the
getSummarizeModelfunction is fixed.Verification successful
Verified the function usage after fixing the logic error.
The
getSummarizeModelfunction is correctly used in the context of summarizing chat history. The logic aligns with the function definition.
Function Definition:
function getSummarizeModel(currentModel: string, modelConfig: ModelConfig) { return currentModel ? modelConfig.model : currentModel; }Function Usage:
const summarizeModel = getSummarizeModel(session.mask.modelConfig.model, sessionModelConfig);The function usage is appropriate and consistent with its definition.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the corrected function usage in chat history summarizing. # Expect: Correct usage of the function after the logic fix. rg --type python -A 5 $'getSummarizeModel'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the corrected function usage in chat history summarizing. # Expect: Correct usage of the function after the logic fix. rg --type ts -A 5 'getSummarizeModel'Length of output: 1105
494-501: Verify the function usage after fixing the logic error.Ensure that the function usage here is correct after the logic error in the
getSummarizeModelfunction is fixed.Verification successful
Verify the function usage after fixing the logic error.
The function
getSummarizeModelis used correctly in the context of summarizing topics. Ensure that the logic error within the function itself is addressed.
- Location:
app/store/chat.tsat lines 494-501 and other relevant lines.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the corrected function usage in topic summarizing. # Expect: Correct usage of the function after the logic fix. rg --type python -A 5 $'getSummarizeModel'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the corrected function usage in topic summarizing. # Expect: Correct usage of the function after the logic fix. rg --type typescript -A 5 'getSummarizeModel'Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the corrected function usage in topic summarizing. # Expect: Correct usage of the function after the logic fix. rg --type ts -A 5 'getSummarizeModel'Length of output: 1105
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
app/store/chat.ts (2)
547-549: Add comments for clarity in message summarization.The usage of
getSummarizeModelhere is correct, but adding comments explaining why this method is chosen based on user selection would enhance maintainability and understanding for future developers.+ // Choose the summarization model based on user selection or fallback to default const summarizeModel = getSummarizeModel(session.mask.modelConfig.model, sessionModelConfig);
Line range hint
1-561: Recommend adding comprehensive documentation and considering refactoring.The file is complex and handles multiple responsibilities. Adding comprehensive documentation, especially for the state management and session handling functions, would greatly aid in maintainability. Additionally, consider refactoring to simplify the structure and improve readability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- app/store/chat.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/store/chat.ts (1)
494-497: Verify integration ofgetSummarizeModelin topic summarization.The integration of the updated
getSummarizeModelfunction appears correct. However, it's crucial to ensure that this behaves as expected across different configurations and session states.
| function getSummarizeModel(currentModel: string, modelConfig: ModelConfig) { | ||
| // should be depends of user selected | ||
| return currentModel ? modelConfig.model : currentModel; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion for clarity in getSummarizeModel function.
The function's logic could be clearer by explicitly checking for null or undefined rather than using a falsy check, which includes 0, "", false, etc., that are unlikely to be valid model names but could potentially lead to unexpected behavior.
- return currentModel ? modelConfig.model : currentModel;
+ return currentModel != null ? currentModel : modelConfig.model;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function getSummarizeModel(currentModel: string, modelConfig: ModelConfig) { | |
| // should be depends of user selected | |
| return currentModel ? modelConfig.model : currentModel; | |
| function getSummarizeModel(currentModel: string, modelConfig: ModelConfig) { | |
| // should be depends of user selected | |
| return currentModel != null ? currentModel : modelConfig.model; |
Note
This pr are fix related to this issue Yidadaa#3429 also this pr are compatible with this pr Yidadaa#3356
Summary by CodeRabbit