Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ensure the forward raytrace points are unique #315

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

ConnorStoneAstro
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ConnorStoneAstro ConnorStoneAstro added the fix A bug fix patch for the codebase label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.19%. Comparing base (512498c) to head (bb15927).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #315      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.17%   91.19%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        2299     2306       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         2096     2103       +7     
  Misses        203      203              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.19% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mjyb16 mjyb16 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, I haven't run the code but it looks correct!

@ConnorStoneAstro ConnorStoneAstro merged commit bf26a57 into dev Jan 25, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix A bug fix patch for the codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants