Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'APscheduler' for none asynchronous auto delete (better than asyn… #335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024

Conversation

MrMKN
Copy link
Contributor

@MrMKN MrMKN commented Nov 16, 2024

…cio.sleep())

@rahulps1000 rahulps1000 requested a review from SHABIN-K November 16, 2024 22:57
@rahulps1000 rahulps1000 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@SHABIN-K SHABIN-K left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀👌

@SHABIN-K SHABIN-K merged commit 65e814e into CodeXBotz:main Nov 17, 2024
1 check passed
@SHABIN-K
Copy link
Member

It seems the deletion operation is not being executed at the correct time. The success message appears prematurely, and the deletion happens a few seconds later. Please adjust the logic to ensure the success message aligns with the actual deletion completion.

@MrMKN
Copy link
Contributor Author

MrMKN commented Nov 23, 2024

It seems the deletion operation is not being executed at the correct time. The success message appears prematurely, and the deletion happens a few seconds later. Please adjust the logic to ensure the success message aligns with the actual deletion completion.

Sorry. but thats not possible in background scheduler. because its synchronous, it will add the task to background and allow to do the next function. other why is add success message to background scheduler

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants