-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Symbolic expression for BlattWeisskopfSquared
for arbitrary L
#417
Comments
Thanks for the reference, that's great! Indeed would be super easy to implement this with SymPy it seems. And will also make the lamdification for parametrized |
First some clarity on the notation of With the definition (If I strictly replace though, it would be something like If so, does this mean the 'Hankel-normalized' Blatt–Weisskopf factor, like in 10.1002/andp.19955070504, p. 415 (in AmpForm denoted It's a bit handwaving here — trying to get the same order of |
Unfortunately it seems that SymPy's But if Equation (96) is sufficient, we could implement a specialized |
With a custom
To get the same polynomials as in the current implementation, this indeed required using |
BlattWeisskopfSquared
BlattWeisskopfSquared
for arbitrary L
Problem description
Polynomials in the
BlattWeisskopfSquared
implementation are complicated.Proposed solution
They can be replaced by symbolic expressions
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/22725744/330131373-f1fe2824-70ee-4e78-b78c-732d8606da48.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MzkxMjg3MjksIm5iZiI6MTczOTEyODQyOSwicGF0aCI6Ii8yMjcyNTc0NC8zMzAxMzEzNzMtZjFmZTI4MjQtNzBlZS00ZTc4LWI3OGMtNzMyZDg2MDZkYTQ4LnBuZz9YLUFtei1BbGdvcml0aG09QVdTNC1ITUFDLVNIQTI1NiZYLUFtei1DcmVkZW50aWFsPUFLSUFWQ09EWUxTQTUzUFFLNFpBJTJGMjAyNTAyMDklMkZ1cy1lYXN0LTElMkZzMyUyRmF3czRfcmVxdWVzdCZYLUFtei1EYXRlPTIwMjUwMjA5VDE5MTM0OVomWC1BbXotRXhwaXJlcz0zMDAmWC1BbXotU2lnbmF0dXJlPTY5MDgyYjJmYTBhODJjYTFiYTIzNzczMmM5YWE3OWI2MDA2NDc5OWZkYzgwNjQxZWUyODZlNjkwMDQ2ZGFhNzUmWC1BbXotU2lnbmVkSGVhZGVycz1ob3N0In0.5sEMY8brOAeA9K07k4Olni1Zx4A1FjFef3J3w5pbxgU)
(the screenshot is from a review)
What should the interface look like?
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: