-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix automatus podman #12230
Fix automatus podman #12230
Conversation
Hi @alanmcanonical. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
In the logs we can see that the problem is |
So according to https://github.com/OpenSCAP/openscap/blob/main/NEWS the virtual profiles have been introduced in 1.3.0. I don't know if Ubuntu/Debians have backported it to older version but it doesn't seem so. |
would it be possible to just define a profile, instead of running with virtual profiles? |
65b2e2e
to
bc86184
Compare
/packit build |
We want to test the rule separately, outside of the profile context, as the rules are in general shared among multiple profiles. |
bc86184
to
0e49c77
Compare
0e49c77
to
14d94c8
Compare
@jan-cerny @Mab879 so we went with the easy path of in the container manually building and installing openscap. Let me know your thoughts. |
I'm okay that. It doesn't seem to take too long, just about minute or two. |
@Mab879 or @jan-cerny if we could merge this one today, it would be nice to use to test some PRs that arrived recently |
Everything is looks good. The example commit triggering the CI needs to removed then we can merge. |
Code Climate has analyzed commit a698789 and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.4% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Description: