Why is this not under OpenAstronomy?

[pllim]

I see that this is used here: https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows/blob/7e9fc90251e98f81f83e01539f1aa143c26643d1/.github/workflows/publish.yml#L223C15-L223C44

[ConorMacBride]

I created it in a hurry and never got around to moving it to OpenAstronomy, and there are too many users to move now. We could fork it to OA if you'd prefer to have it there?

[pllim]

I think you can still move it and it would still work as long as you keep your fork updated.

[pllim]

Also https://github.com/astrofrog/batchpr is very handy for doing auto updates to all your users.

[bsipocz]

fwiw, if you move a repo to a different org, the original location will redirect, as long as you don't fork it into the same name again.

We migrated circleci-artifacts-redirector-action quite recently, it has a wide user base and no one complained.

[ConorMacBride]

The note on this documentation page seems to suggest that it won't redirect? In any case, I am keen to move this to OA as that was my initial intention. I'll then quickly fork it back to here.

[bsipocz]

Now sure how the docs page you reference here is relevant.
The repo will redirect as any repo would, until you make another repo in your account with the same name, e.g. forking this one back from OA. So when you fork, you need to use a different name.

xref for an action that we moved from a personal account into an org without experiencing any issues:

scientific-python/circleci-artifacts-redirector-action#50 (comment)

and the PR

scientific-python/circleci-artifacts-redirector-action#49

[ConorMacBride]

Nice! Looks like it'll work without the fork. I got the doc link from actions/runner#1695 but just seeing the last comment now pointing out the confusion