Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration #1681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2022

Conversation

lifflander
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #1680

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (clang-3.9, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (clang-5.0, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-6, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-5, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (nvidia cuda 10.1, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (clang-10, alpine, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.0, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@github-actions
Copy link

PR tests (gcc-7, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, LB)

Build for fa38f45

Compilation - successful

Testing - passed

Build log

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1681 (fa38f45) into develop (bd49827) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1681   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    83.50%   83.51%           
========================================
  Files          799      799           
  Lines        30919    30920    +1     
========================================
+ Hits         25820    25822    +2     
+ Misses        5099     5098    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/vt/vrt/collection/balance/baselb/baselb.cc 93.87% <100.00%> (-0.97%) ⬇️
src/vt/messaging/request_holder.h 82.85% <0.00%> (+5.71%) ⬆️

@lifflander lifflander merged commit 68d68d2 into develop Feb 21, 2022
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2022
#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2022
#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
#1680: lb: only add to migration if its actually a migration
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Number of migrations printed is wrong
2 participants