-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#1786: condition link flag on library's presence #1787
#1786: condition link flag on library's presence #1787
Conversation
PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
0456635
to
7842ba2
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1787 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 84.15% 84.14% -0.01%
===========================================
Files 753 753
Lines 26127 26127
===========================================
- Hits 21987 21985 -2
- Misses 4140 4142 +2
|
PR tests (intel icpx, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
PR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 49aace0
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make sure that this is working as intended, we could have one of the builds running without libunwind
.
Maybe Alpine? (edit: Alpine has to stick with libunwind
)
Maybe Ubuntu/OpenMPI? Removing this line should be enough:
libunwind-dev \ |
Looks good otherwise 👍
7842ba2
to
b662350
Compare
Thanks @cz4rs. Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
b662350
to
49aace0
Compare
Fixes #1786. Follow-up to issue #1691.