-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1943 scheduler check optimizations #1962
Conversation
Pipelines resultsPR tests (gcc-5, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-3.9, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-5.0, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-6, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-7, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, LB) Build for 85c49e8
PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (nvidia cuda 10.1, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.0, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-13, alpine, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (intel icpx, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 15c7cd4
PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (intel icpc, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 282e7c8
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich, json schema test) Build for 282e7c8
|
Deleting the pointer relies on the upcoming changes to runnable. Simply remove for now and revisit after #1899. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1962 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 84.04% 84.02% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 728 726 -2
Lines 25608 25534 -74
===========================================
- Hits 21522 21455 -67
+ Misses 4086 4079 -7
|
Is that class's destructor supposed to be virtual? Separately, is that a memory leak in the current code base? |
Why does only nvcc think it's not a complete type? |
The current code base uses a unique pointer- In work for #1899, changes were made to RunnablePtrType. We should consider them there when the PR is ready. |
2f4ac5a
to
15c7cd4
Compare
15c7cd4
to
282e7c8
Compare
…mizations 1943 scheduler check optimizations
Closes #1943. Add vt_check_enabled statements to reduce unneeded code in the scheduler.