Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Footer style....again #61

Open
ldecicco-USGS opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Footer style....again #61

ldecicco-USGS opened this issue Mar 2, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ldecicco-USGS
Copy link
Contributor

This might need to go to vizlab. Right now, there seems to be some issue with the footer style.

I think it is because there is only 1 vizzy (I know I've tested vizlab with 2 vizzies and 1 vizzy/1 blog and it looked fine).

So, I'm guessing we'll (@mwernimont ) will need to fiddle with come footer css to make it not wrap the text at ~half the width that it's currently doing.

image

@aappling-usgs
Copy link
Contributor

Nice writeup, @ldecicco-USGS . This looks to me like a vizlab issue - @mwernimont , could you confirm that the fixes should take place in the vizlab package?

I'm open to us taking this on in the next week or three. Whether we absolutely need to address it simultaneously with this water use viz depends on whether we have a 2nd vizzy/blog we want to share. If we do have a 2nd blog/vizzy and therefore don't need to address this issue right away, then the timing just depends on availability of someone, probably marty, to put in a few vizlab hours.

@mwernimont
Copy link
Contributor

Any footer changes do need to take place in the Vizlab foot template

@lindsayplatt
Copy link

The part listed above was fixed by vizlab USGS-VIZLAB/vizlab#353 and USGS-VIZLAB/vizlab#359. BUT there is still smooshing of the images in IE as Laura noted in USGS-VIZLAB/vizlab#347 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants