Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using sync.Map instead of mutex + Map for concurrency lock #319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

Using sync.Map instead of mutex + Map for concurrency lock #319

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

jt-dd
Copy link
Contributor

@jt-dd jt-dd commented Jan 24, 2025

Using sync.Map instead of mutex + Map for concurrency lock.

@jt-dd jt-dd marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 14:30
@jt-dd jt-dd requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 14:30
@jt-dd jt-dd merged commit d9710f9 into main Jan 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@jt-dd jt-dd deleted the jt-dd/kubehound-concurrency-switch-to-sync-map branch January 24, 2025 15:39
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@edznux-dd edznux-dd edznux-dd approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jt-dd @edznux-dd