Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal for checking instrumentation/framework versions #19

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 27, 2017

Conversation

gpolaert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gpolaert gpolaert requested a review from tylerbenson June 26, 2017 20:58
@gpolaert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tylerbenson It's working :) but could you give me your feedback. I'm not very confident using static methods

Copy link
Contributor

@tylerbenson tylerbenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this PR would have been nicer if the version checking was separated from the JMS support.

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ ENDRULE

# Instrument Elasticsearch Transport Client
# ==========================================
RULE elasticsearch
RULE opentracing-elasticsearch-client
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since these names are used in the config to allow customers to disable instrumentation, I think it would be good to document the list of names, or update the documentation to explain how to find the name needed.

Copy link
Contributor

@tylerbenson tylerbenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this diff is mostly confusing because of the differences with the branch it was based on. It might be cleaned up with rebasing, but no big deal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants