-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 376
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix top-level return when Ruby < 2.4 #3795
Conversation
gemfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_gemfile | ||
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' | ||
datadog_lockfile = lockfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile.lock' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
ENV['GEM_PATH'] = Gem.path.join(':') | ||
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = datadog_gemfile.to_s | ||
dd_skip_injection! | ||
rescue Exception => e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
rescue Exception => e | |
rescue StandardError => e |
Do not rescue the Exception class (...read more)
The rule "Do not rescue the Exception class" is a crucial practice in Ruby programming for handling exceptions. The Exception class is the root of Ruby's exception hierarchy, so when you rescue Exception, you're potentially catching and handling severe system errors that Ruby itself is trying to bubble up. These could be fundamental issues like memory overflows and syntax errors, which could cause the program to behave unexpectedly or even crash.
Rescuing the Exception class can lead to major problems in debugging since it can hide the true nature of the error and its source. It makes it harder to pinpoint where and why the error occurred. This can lead to significant delays in identifying and resolving coding issues.
Instead of rescuing the Exception class, it is better to rescue more specific error classes or use StandardError
which is the superclass for most error types. For instance, if you're expecting possible nil values, use rescue NoMethodError
. This allows Ruby to handle severe system errors appropriately and ensures that you're only rescuing the errors you expect. This practice makes your code safer, more predictable, and easier to maintain and debug.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
dd_send_telemetry([{ name: 'library_entrypoint.error', tags: ['error_type:injection_failure'] }]) | ||
else | ||
# Look for pre-installed tracers | ||
Gem.paths = { 'GEM_PATH' => "#{dd_lib_injection_path}:#{ENV['GEM_PATH']}" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
if status.success? | ||
dd_debug_log "#{gem} already installed... skipping..." | ||
next | ||
Open3.capture2e([fowarder, 'library_entrypoint'], stdin_data: payload) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } | ||
add_output, add_status = Open3.capture2e(env, bundle_add_cmd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
gemfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_gemfile | ||
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' | ||
datadog_lockfile = lockfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile.lock' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
ENV['GEM_PATH'] = Gem.path.join(':') | ||
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = datadog_gemfile.to_s | ||
dd_skip_injection! | ||
rescue Exception => e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
rescue Exception => e | |
rescue StandardError => e |
Do not rescue the Exception class (...read more)
The rule "Do not rescue the Exception class" is a crucial practice in Ruby programming for handling exceptions. The Exception class is the root of Ruby's exception hierarchy, so when you rescue Exception, you're potentially catching and handling severe system errors that Ruby itself is trying to bubble up. These could be fundamental issues like memory overflows and syntax errors, which could cause the program to behave unexpectedly or even crash.
Rescuing the Exception class can lead to major problems in debugging since it can hide the true nature of the error and its source. It makes it harder to pinpoint where and why the error occurred. This can lead to significant delays in identifying and resolving coding issues.
Instead of rescuing the Exception class, it is better to rescue more specific error classes or use StandardError
which is the superclass for most error types. For instance, if you're expecting possible nil values, use rescue NoMethodError
. This allows Ruby to handle severe system errors appropriately and ensures that you're only rescuing the errors you expect. This practice makes your code safer, more predictable, and easier to maintain and debug.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
dd_send_telemetry([{ name: 'library_entrypoint.error', tags: ['error_type:injection_failure'] }]) | ||
else | ||
# Look for pre-installed tracers | ||
Gem.paths = { 'GEM_PATH' => "#{dd_lib_injection_path}:#{ENV['GEM_PATH']}" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
if status.success? | ||
dd_debug_log "#{gem} already installed... skipping..." | ||
next | ||
Open3.capture2e([fowarder, 'library_entrypoint'], stdin_data: payload) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } | ||
add_output, add_status = Open3.capture2e(env, bundle_add_cmd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
gemfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_gemfile | ||
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' | ||
datadog_lockfile = lockfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile.lock' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
ENV['GEM_PATH'] = Gem.path.join(':') | ||
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = datadog_gemfile.to_s | ||
dd_skip_injection! | ||
rescue Exception => e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
rescue Exception => e | |
rescue StandardError => e |
Do not rescue the Exception class (...read more)
The rule "Do not rescue the Exception class" is a crucial practice in Ruby programming for handling exceptions. The Exception class is the root of Ruby's exception hierarchy, so when you rescue Exception, you're potentially catching and handling severe system errors that Ruby itself is trying to bubble up. These could be fundamental issues like memory overflows and syntax errors, which could cause the program to behave unexpectedly or even crash.
Rescuing the Exception class can lead to major problems in debugging since it can hide the true nature of the error and its source. It makes it harder to pinpoint where and why the error occurred. This can lead to significant delays in identifying and resolving coding issues.
Instead of rescuing the Exception class, it is better to rescue more specific error classes or use StandardError
which is the superclass for most error types. For instance, if you're expecting possible nil values, use rescue NoMethodError
. This allows Ruby to handle severe system errors appropriately and ensures that you're only rescuing the errors you expect. This practice makes your code safer, more predictable, and easier to maintain and debug.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
dd_send_telemetry([{ name: 'library_entrypoint.error', tags: ['error_type:injection_failure'] }]) | ||
else | ||
# Look for pre-installed tracers | ||
Gem.paths = { 'GEM_PATH' => "#{dd_lib_injection_path}:#{ENV['GEM_PATH']}" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
if status.success? | ||
dd_debug_log "#{gem} already installed... skipping..." | ||
next | ||
Open3.capture2e([fowarder, 'library_entrypoint'], stdin_data: payload) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } | ||
add_output, add_status = Open3.capture2e(env, bundle_add_cmd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
ENV['GEM_PATH'] = Gem.path.join(':') | ||
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = datadog_gemfile.to_s | ||
dd_skip_injection! | ||
rescue Exception => e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
rescue Exception => e | |
rescue StandardError => e |
Do not rescue the Exception class (...read more)
The rule "Do not rescue the Exception class" is a crucial practice in Ruby programming for handling exceptions. The Exception class is the root of Ruby's exception hierarchy, so when you rescue Exception, you're potentially catching and handling severe system errors that Ruby itself is trying to bubble up. These could be fundamental issues like memory overflows and syntax errors, which could cause the program to behave unexpectedly or even crash.
Rescuing the Exception class can lead to major problems in debugging since it can hide the true nature of the error and its source. It makes it harder to pinpoint where and why the error occurred. This can lead to significant delays in identifying and resolving coding issues.
Instead of rescuing the Exception class, it is better to rescue more specific error classes or use StandardError
which is the superclass for most error types. For instance, if you're expecting possible nil values, use rescue NoMethodError
. This allows Ruby to handle severe system errors appropriately and ensures that you're only rescuing the errors you expect. This practice makes your code safer, more predictable, and easier to maintain and debug.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
gemfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_gemfile | ||
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
dd_send_telemetry([{ name: 'library_entrypoint.error', tags: ['error_type:injection_failure'] }]) | ||
else | ||
# Look for pre-installed tracers | ||
Gem.paths = { 'GEM_PATH' => "#{dd_lib_injection_path}:#{ENV['GEM_PATH']}" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' | ||
datadog_lockfile = lockfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile.lock' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } | ||
add_output, add_status = Open3.capture2e(env, bundle_add_cmd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
if status.success? | ||
dd_debug_log "#{gem} already installed... skipping..." | ||
next | ||
Open3.capture2e([fowarder, 'library_entrypoint'], stdin_data: payload) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
ENV['GEM_PATH'] = Gem.path.join(':') | ||
ENV['BUNDLE_GEMFILE'] = datadog_gemfile.to_s | ||
dd_skip_injection! | ||
rescue Exception => e |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
rescue Exception => e | |
rescue StandardError => e |
Do not rescue the Exception class (...read more)
The rule "Do not rescue the Exception class" is a crucial practice in Ruby programming for handling exceptions. The Exception class is the root of Ruby's exception hierarchy, so when you rescue Exception, you're potentially catching and handling severe system errors that Ruby itself is trying to bubble up. These could be fundamental issues like memory overflows and syntax errors, which could cause the program to behave unexpectedly or even crash.
Rescuing the Exception class can lead to major problems in debugging since it can hide the true nature of the error and its source. It makes it harder to pinpoint where and why the error occurred. This can lead to significant delays in identifying and resolving coding issues.
Instead of rescuing the Exception class, it is better to rescue more specific error classes or use StandardError
which is the superclass for most error types. For instance, if you're expecting possible nil values, use rescue NoMethodError
. This allows Ruby to handle severe system errors appropriately and ensures that you're only rescuing the errors you expect. This practice makes your code safer, more predictable, and easier to maintain and debug.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
gemfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_gemfile | ||
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
dd_send_telemetry([{ name: 'library_entrypoint.error', tags: ['error_type:injection_failure'] }]) | ||
else | ||
# Look for pre-installed tracers | ||
Gem.paths = { 'GEM_PATH' => "#{dd_lib_injection_path}:#{ENV['GEM_PATH']}" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)
In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.
The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.
To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 }
to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 }
will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.
lockfile = Bundler::SharedHelpers.default_lockfile | ||
|
||
datadog_gemfile = gemfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile' | ||
datadog_lockfile = lockfile.dirname + '.datadog-Gemfile.lock' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚪ Code Quality Violation
Consider using string interpolation or formatting instead of concatenation. (...read more)
The rule "Avoid string concatenation" is an important coding practice in Ruby for ensuring efficient and clean code. String concatenation in Ruby using the '+' operator creates a new string object, which can lead to excessive memory usage and slower performance when dealing with large strings or performing the operation multiple times.
Instead, Ruby provides alternatives that are more efficient. The string interpolation syntax #{}
allows you to insert variables directly into strings without creating new string objects. This is not only more memory efficient, but also provides cleaner and more readable code.
Another alternative is the format
method, which allows you to create a formatted string with placeholders for variables. This method is particularly useful when dealing with more complex strings, as it provides a clear and concise way to format your strings.
By following this rule, you can write more efficient and cleaner Ruby code, leading to better performance and readability.
env = { 'BUNDLE_GEMFILE' => datadog_gemfile.to_s, | ||
'DD_TRACE_SKIP_LIB_INJECTION' => 'true', | ||
'GEM_PATH' => dd_lib_injection_path } | ||
add_output, add_status = Open3.capture2e(env, bundle_add_cmd) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
if status.success? | ||
dd_debug_log "#{gem} already installed... skipping..." | ||
next | ||
Open3.capture2e([fowarder, 'library_entrypoint'], stdin_data: payload) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🟠 Code Vulnerability
Potential shell injection, check inputs are not coming from untrusted data (...read more)
This rule checks for potential shell injection vulnerabilities in your Ruby code. Shell injection is a serious security risk, as it allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on your system, potentially leading to data theft, corruption, or other malicious actions. When user input is used to form shell commands, it is essential to ensure that it cannot be manipulated to alter the intended command execution.
The importance of this rule cannot be overstated. Preventing shell injection attacks is a critical aspect of maintaining the security and integrity of your application and its data. Shell injections can lead to severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromise.
To avoid shell injection vulnerabilities, always use the array form of system commands in Ruby, such as system("echo", "Hello, World!")
instead of system("echo Hello, World!")
. The array form ensures that the arguments are passed directly to the command and not interpreted by the shell. Also, avoid using user input directly in shell commands. If it's unavoidable, make sure to sanitize the input thoroughly before using it. Use libraries such as Shellwords.escape
to escape any potentially dangerous characters in the user input.
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2024-07-22 12:57:39 Comparing candidate commit 8517f8d in PR branch Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 9 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. scenario:Tracing.log_correlation
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3795 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.91% 97.91%
=======================================
Files 1246 1246
Lines 75037 75037
Branches 3629 3629
=======================================
Hits 73473 73473
Misses 1564 1564 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What does this PR do?
This PR refactor the injection script in order avoid failure for older rubies (< 2.4)
This syntax top-level return is available after Ruby 2.4
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4840
Before when running with older Rubies
After (Without error)
root@47c2d42343c2:/app# BUNDLE_GEMFILE=Gemfile RUBYOPT=-r/app/lib-injection/host_inject bundle exec ruby test.rb