Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring iso15118 EVerest types #1050

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Refactoring iso15118 EVerest types #1050

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

SebaLukas
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes

  • Combined both types iso15118_charger + iso15118_ev into one iso15118 type.
  • Added ChargingNeeds type for OCPP 2.1

Issue ticket number and link

For OCPP 2.1 we need some information from the ev. So we added these types to the iso15118 everest type yaml file.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I read the contribution documentation and made sure that my changes meet its requirements

@AssemblyJohn
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good! For 2.1, it's better to share types than to have them defined in 2 places.

@SebaLukas SebaLukas added the post-release Tag that this PR should not go into the current merge window for the upcoming release label Feb 14, 2025
@SebaLukas
Copy link
Contributor Author

SebaLukas commented Feb 17, 2025

Waiting for #1022

- Renamed iso15118_charger type file to iso15118
- Adding generated iso types for OCPP2.1
- Refactored the enum types
- Removing ChargingSchedule type
- Spelling mistakes changed
- clang-format

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lukas <[email protected]>
@SebaLukas SebaLukas merged commit 0c6449f into main Feb 17, 2025
11 checks passed
@SebaLukas SebaLukas deleted the refactor/iso_types branch February 17, 2025 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
post-release Tag that this PR should not go into the current merge window for the upcoming release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants