Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge d973e11 into merged_master (Elements PR #1014)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
apoelstra committed Sep 5, 2021
2 parents ba3d786 + d973e11 commit 58222ba
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 38 additions and 0 deletions.
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions src/blind.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -199,6 +199,15 @@ bool SurjectOutput(CTxOutWitness& txoutwit, const std::vector<secp256k1_fixed_as
secp256k1_surjectionproof proof;
secp256k1_fixed_asset_tag tag;
memcpy(&tag, asset.begin(), 32);
// FIXME [hardfork] Elements currently cannot handle surjection proofs on transactions
// with more than 256 inputs. The Elements verification code will always try to give
// secp-zkp the complete list of inputs, and if this exceeds 256 then surjectionproof_verify
// will always return false, so there is no way to work around this situation at signing time
if (surjection_targets.size() > SECP256K1_SURJECTIONPROOF_MAX_N_INPUTS) {
// We must return false here to avoid triggering an assertation within
// secp256k1_surjectionproof_initialize on the next line.
return false;
}
// Find correlation between asset tag and listed input tags
if (secp256k1_surjectionproof_initialize(secp256k1_blind_context, &proof, &input_index, &surjection_targets[0], surjection_targets.size(), nInputsToSelect, &tag, 100, randseed) == 0) {
return false;
Expand Down
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ def run_test(self):
self.test_subtract_fee_with_presets()
self.test_transaction_too_large()
self.test_include_unsafe()
self.test_surjectionproof_many_inputs()

def test_change_position(self):
"""Ensure setting changePosition in fundraw with an exact match is handled properly."""
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1036,5 +1037,33 @@ def test_include_unsafe(self):
wallet.sendrawtransaction(signedtx['hex'])


def test_surjectionproof_many_inputs(self):
self.log.info("Test fundrawtx with more than 256 inputs")

self.nodes[0].createwallet("surjection")
wallet = self.nodes[0].get_wallet_rpc(self.default_wallet_name)
recipient = self.nodes[0].get_wallet_rpc("surjection")

# Make 500 0.1 BTC outputs...
for j in range(0, 10):
outputs = {}
for i in range(0, 50):
outputs[recipient.getnewaddress()] = 0.1
wallet.sendmany("", outputs)
self.nodes[0].generate(10)

# ...and try to send them all in one transaction
# This should fail but we should not see an assertation failure.
rawtx = recipient.createrawtransaction([], [{wallet.getnewaddress(): 49.99}])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Unable to blind the transaction properly. This should not happen.", recipient.fundrawtransaction, rawtx)

# Try to send them across two transactions. This should succeed.
rawtx = recipient.createrawtransaction([], [{wallet.getnewaddress(): 24.99}])
for i in range(0, 2):
fundedtx = recipient.fundrawtransaction(rawtx)
blindedtx = recipient.blindrawtransaction(fundedtx['hex'])
signedtx = recipient.signrawtransactionwithwallet(blindedtx)
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signedtx['hex'])

if __name__ == '__main__':
RawTransactionsTest().main()

0 comments on commit 58222ba

Please sign in to comment.