Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taxes - Tax rate and tax amount take some time to show up in transaction thread #39615

Closed
6 tasks done
kbecciv opened this issue Apr 4, 2024 · 15 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff retest-weekly Apply this label if you want this issue tested on a Weekly basis by Applause

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Apr 4, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.60-1
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

Precondition:

  • User is an employee of Collect workspace that has taxes.
  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace chat.
  3. Create a manual request with tax.
  4. Go to transaction thread immediately after the request is created.

Expected Result:

Tax rate and tax amount will instantly show up in transaction thread.

Actual Result:

Tax rate and tax amount take some time to show up in transaction thread.

Workaround:

n/a

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6437960_1712235526985.bandicam_2024-04-04_20-55-53-264.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~013d484f5c32510e05
  • Upwork Job ID: 1775993187810840576
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-04-04
@kbecciv kbecciv added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Apr 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @flodnv (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@kbecciv
Copy link
Author

kbecciv commented Apr 4, 2024

We think that this bug might be related to #wave-collect - Release 1

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Not a blocker, i think
We'll be fixing as a regression from #33927

@alitoshmatov
Copy link
Contributor

This is related to offline updates which was not on scope of mentioned PR, and is going to be handled separately, ref: #33927 (comment)

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg assigned MonilBhavsar and unassigned flodnv Apr 4, 2024
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg added Daily KSv2 Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels Apr 4, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~013d484f5c32510e05

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor Plus for review of internal employee PR - @mananjadhav (Internal)

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @lschurr (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

This is related to offline updates which was not on scope of mentioned PR, and is going to be handled separately, ref:

@alitoshmatov I don't think this is related to offline in any case. This looks an issue with rendering

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, I think this is fixed with this change https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/39638/files#diff-eec4675b6213eb7b4c8826a7b0a536ee7455e6a5580476ef0f9c8964e5deea81R163

@kbecciv can we please retest and confirm. Thank you!

@MonilBhavsar MonilBhavsar added the retest-weekly Apply this label if you want this issue tested on a Weekly basis by Applause label Apr 5, 2024
@teneeto
Copy link
Contributor

teneeto commented Apr 5, 2024

Hi, I'm Eto from Callstack - expert contributor group - and I would like to take care of this issue.

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting for confirming from QA team (cc @kbecciv)
If reproducible, Eto Olei will be taking a look

@lschurr
Copy link
Contributor

lschurr commented Apr 8, 2024

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Apr 8, 2024

@lschurr issue is fixed now.
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/43996225/32d39438-ccfd-4346-a36e-5b404108d506

@MonilBhavsar #39804 which was closed as dupe of #39615 still repro. Can we reopen that issue?

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

MonilBhavsar commented Apr 9, 2024

Thank you for confirming @kbecciv!
We can close this issue then


#39804 is really a duplicate of #39615
Once #39615 is fixed, #39804 will also be fixed. They have the same root cause - data not being updated optimistically. As a result, there is some delay as data is being returned by server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 Engineering Internal Requires API changes or must be handled by Expensify staff retest-weekly Apply this label if you want this issue tested on a Weekly basis by Applause
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants