Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workspace Editor Page Design Updates #12419

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022
Merged

Conversation

dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous commented Nov 3, 2022

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #12257

Tests

  • See QA Steps
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

QA Steps

Note: I'm sorry in advance. The testing steps are the same on all platforms. There should be no changes to functionality with any of these code changes. I'm a little unsure if these will actually get to all the screens - I had to hack a bit locally to make it work - so please reach out to me if you need assistance and we can work through it together.

  • Log into an account without a VBA.
    • Create a new Workspace and go to the Workspace Settings
      • Click the question mark in the top right of the Workspace Settings view and confirm that the design matches 1 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
        • Go to Request a setup call and confirm that the design matches 2 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Issue cards and confirm that the design matches 10 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Reimburse expenses and confirm that the design matches 16, 17, and 19 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Pay bills and confirm that the design matches 7 and 8 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Send invoices and confirm that the design matches 13 and 14 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Book travel and confirm that the design matches 20 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Connect bank account and confirm that the design matches 3 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Connect a bank account via Plaid and continue to the end of the flow, where it asks you to add a work email address. Confirm that the design matches 5 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected
      • Cancel adding that bank account and restart the connection manually.
      • When you get to the flow asking for verification amounts, leave the flow.
      • Go back into Workspace settings and click Connect bank account again. Confirm that the design matches 4 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Return to the validation screen and enter in the amounts and continue. Confirm that the design matches 6 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
  • Log into an account/workspace with a VBA.
    • Go to the Workspace Settings
      • Go to Issue cards and confirm that the design matches 11 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Reimburse expenses and confirm that the design matches 16, 17, and 18 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Pay bills and confirm that the design matches 7 and 9 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Send invoices and confirm that the design matches 13 and 15 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
      • Go to Book travel and confirm that the design matches 21 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
  • Log into an account/workspace with a VBA and an Expensify Card
    • Go to the Workspace settings
    • Go to Issue cards and confirm that the design matches 12 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
  • Log into an account/workspace with an Expensify Card.
    • Go to the Workspace Settings
    • Go to Connect a bank account and go through the flow adding a bank account via Plaid.
    • After verifying your personal information, confirm that the design matches 22 in the screenshots file, and all buttons/links work as expected.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline Steps

  • No changes are expected, offline elements should be greyed out; errors on relaunch should be displayed as before.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above

  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR

    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms

  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:

    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)

  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)

    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers

  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines

  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)

  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)

  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such

  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly

  • If a new component is created I verified that:

    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:

    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)

  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.

  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

All screenshots are available here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1nv9cicwl758ea7/Screenshots.zip?dl=0

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

@dangrous dangrous self-assigned this Nov 3, 2022
@dangrous dangrous changed the title initial updates for style on workspace editor page Workspace Editor Page Design Updates Nov 3, 2022
@@ -2761,6 +2761,20 @@ const styles = {
fontSize: variables.fontSizeSmall,
...spacing.ph2,
},

workspaceSection: {
backgroundColor: colors.gray1,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we can make a more global value here that comes from the theme file... something like themeColors.cardBackground or something? Then in the theme file, use gray1

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, ideally we don't want to import colors anywhere except into the theme file. I'll be working on this when I update the colors in the upcoming week, but feel free to add as a variable todefault.js for now!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good!

@@ -2761,6 +2761,20 @@ const styles = {
fontSize: variables.fontSizeSmall,
...spacing.ph2,
},

workspaceSection: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is fine for now, but I could see making this even more generic... like cardSection or something? In case we use it elsewhere

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah I like that too. This was already more genericized than my first attempt (workspaceEditorSection) but will make it even broader.

workspaceSection: {
backgroundColor: colors.gray1,
borderRadius: variables.componentBorderRadiusCard,
marginVertical: 10,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can just do bottom margin for all of these cards? This way the first card in a view will sit more towards the top.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh that works

menuItems={[
{
title: this.props.translate('workspace.reimburse.viewAllReceipts'),
onPress: () => Link.openOldDotLink(`expenses?policyIDList=${this.props.policy.id}&billableReimbursable=reimbursable&submitterEmail=%2B%2B`),
icon: Expensicons.Receipt,
shouldShowRightIcon: true,
iconRight: Expensicons.NewWindow,
iconFill: themeColors.buttonSuccessBG,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we're holding for new color theme, you'll want to use themeColors.success

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can wait on this until the colors are merged, I just wanted to make a note

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool! Will keep this in here for now for testing purposes but can swap it once that's ready to go.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

dangrous commented Nov 8, 2022

Updated! I think I caught everything in the Figma you shared. There are a couple more places in settings where we use the same Section component, which I think are also the places we might want to update illustrations. They are:

  • Enable Step (I think this is in the bank account setup flow but I'm not sure)
  • Validation Step (I think this is in the bank account setup flow but I'm not sure)
  • Workspace Bank Account Page
  • Workspace Bills VBA View
  • Workspace Card No VBA View
  • Workspace Card VBA No ECard View
  • Workspace Card VBA With ECard View
  • Workspace Invoices VBA View
  • Workspace Reimburse View (there's a fourth card for if they have a VBA)
  • Workspace Travel VBA View

I think all of those will show up on an account that has a bank account connected - except for Workspace Card No VBA View which you may be able to get to now. I think the Card is referencing the Expensify card? I will try to get some screenshots of the existing design of the others so you can work on what you want instead!

There are also a couple places we use Sections that AREN'T settings related. I think it still would likely be worth changing these as well, but would love to know what you think. If we do update them, I'll go through this code and put all the styles into the component as defaults instead of passing it each time here. Those places are:

  • Get Assistance Page
  • Request Call Page

Also, I didn't update the button shapes (since that will be global, right?) or the icons (since I don't have the icons yet) but happy to do either/both if we have the goods.

And, let me know if you want me to rename any of the illustrations; these should mostly be fine but some are a little wonky (if we're eventually going to remove the existing ones we can be a little more broad in how we name these).

Lastly, there are some merge conflicts, I'll work on those separately.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, no worries on the button shape or icons just yet.

For those sections you referenced, can you share screenshots of them here?

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

dangrous commented Nov 9, 2022

@shawnborton here you go! There are a couple I couldn't quite figure out how to get at yet, so I screenshotted the code (that notes what icons are used). I realize that's not super helpful but figured you could start on the others and then I will keep figuring out how to see the remaining four.

Remaining Sections.zip

Also please remind me that in this PR i changed the background color of the sections to blue so I could see them better, so I need to update that before we go much further.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Here's another batch of illustrations to use: MoreSimpleIllustrations.zip

I tried going through your screenshots in the same Figma file... here are some proposed ideas:

image

We might want to change the headline for this one, the equals sign made the break a bit awkward:
image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome, thanks @shawnborton ! I've updated all of the screens and so I'm going to go through and screenshot their final forms (and really try to get those last few). Now that we have updated ALL of them, I'm going to switch out the styling changes from each individual instance into the main <Section> component, too. Will post screenshots here, and then I think we just hold for the new colors/icons!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds great, thanks for the update! I'm planning to do a weekly update for the overall branding tasks in the open source room tomorrow, so let me know where we're at by tomorrow morning when you get a moment.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

Haven't had time for anything yet but things are slowing down outside of this PR so I plan to have it completed and ready for final review later today!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds great, thanks for the update!

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok have been thrown in a bunch of different directions today even though I was hoping not to be. Started going through this and will be able to finish tomorrow.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just committing some more updates here. Just the last four remaining (the harder ones to figure out where they actually exist... Can track progress here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NEe1pc-1Wy2f0gpSCPPAb0SsHSAeXub56BuX_6-oaBU/edit#gid=0

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated and ready for review! I believe this should remain on hold until the new colors/icons are ready because I'll likely have to make some final changes at that point. But, it's all synced up with the new style in all the sections.

Screenshots, labelled by the number noted in the Google Sheet are here - all 138 of them. There are also a couple marked "OLD" which is for places I was able to get what they looked like before.

Lastly, I didn't make that copy change (the = one) because I figured we should wait for the new fonts in case the line break was different. I believe I made all the other changes, but take a look at the screenshots to make sure - you only really have to look at one of the platforms, they're pretty much all the same.

@dangrous dangrous changed the title Workspace Editor Page Design Updates [HOLD] Workspace Editor Page Design Updates Nov 16, 2022
@dangrous dangrous marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2022 21:42
@dangrous dangrous requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2022 21:42
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aldo-expensify and Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team November 16, 2022 21:42
@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Thoughts @shawnborton @grgia ?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I am down to merge and do follow ups for the small things we might have missed. Thanks so much for the review Aldo, I know this was a big one!

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia do you want to review before I merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, tested dark mode

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

@Santhosh-Sellavel all you!

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the bump on it already!

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Nov 23, 2022

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Note missed a few screens that I can't access like with an Expensify card.

Web
Screen.Recording.2022-11-23.at.6.21.52.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen_Recording_20221123_063938_Chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
RPReplay_Final1669165540.MP4
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2022-11-23.at.6.29.38.AM.mov
iOS & Android
Screen.Recording.2022-11-23.at.6.41.33.AM.mov

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this expected on offline, shouldn't buttons be disabled?
cc: @shawnborton
Screenshot_1669166715

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm good catch, how does it currently work on the main branch?

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Same behaviour on main too!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Okay cool, then no worries if it's the same thing on main.

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we log a bug for it @shawnborton ?

Copy link
Collaborator

@Santhosh-Sellavel Santhosh-Sellavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

@Santhosh-Sellavel can't hurt, you can bring that up in #expensify-bugs

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Nov 23, 2022

If the bug is logged, am I good to merge this?

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton from this slack conversation , I understand that we should proceed with the merge, right?

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Lol, now I see that Luke posted "Buttons merged", so I guess that was about a different PR

@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify merged commit d849d85 into main Nov 23, 2022
@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify deleted the dangrous-workspace-editor branch November 23, 2022 18:53
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

shawnborton commented Nov 23, 2022 via email

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Done!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @aldo-expensify in version: 1.2.31-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

The production deploy comment failed for this PR, but this was deployed to production on v1.2.32-2 on Nov 28.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor Author

As requested in #13318 (comment) - commenting here. This was not really a bug per se so we don't need a new process. Generally I guess we should make sure that if multiple PRs are affecting something (say, a redesign), we make sure that all of them are considered in each. In this case, we were matching the style of the old buttons, and not the new ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants