Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update IOU Preview Card Styles #12762

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022
Merged

Update IOU Preview Card Styles #12762

merged 25 commits into from
Nov 23, 2022

Conversation

grgia
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia commented Nov 16, 2022

Details

Updating the IOU Preview Styles
image

Fixed Issues

$ #12258
$ #12958

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

image

Set to offline, card looks good + highlight still works

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

To test in Dark Mode. Change the export line in default.js to export default darkTheme;

  1. Have account A request money from account B
  2. Cancel a request from account A
  3. Have account A request money from account B
  4. Decline a request from account B
  5. Have account A initiate a Split with Account B and account C
  6. Pay a request from account A from account B
  • Ensure styles are correct (see Shawn's mockups above)
  • ensure color changes when highlighted
  • ensure clicking on preview box opens modal, ensure clicking on arrow opens modal

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above

  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR

    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms

  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:

    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)

  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)

    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers

  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines

  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)

  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)

  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such

  • If a new component is created I verified that:

    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:

    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)

  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.

  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for expected offline behavior are in the Offline steps section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

Light Light Hover Dark Dark Hover
image image image image

Mobile Web - Chrome

Light Dark
image image

Mobile Web - Safari

Light Dark
image image

Desktop

Light Light Hover Dark Dark Hover
image image image image

iOS

Light Dark
image image

Android

Light Dark
image image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like that gray is just one shade too dark (should be gray1, FWIW). That being said, maybe we should handle the row hover case and make the BG darker on hover? This is similar to what we would do for the workspace names in pills in the LHN on hover.

Also, looks like we need to handle the border outline for the avatars too.

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Nov 18, 2022

image

Here's what it looks like with gray1, working on your other suggestions now

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, that looks good!

Copy link
Contributor

@Luke9389 Luke9389 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love how the redesign seems to be removing styles (most of the time). PR looks good except for the un-needed imports 👍

Comment on lines 41 to 37
{props.translate('iou.viewDetails')}
{Str.htmlDecode(fragment.text.split(' ')[0])}
Copy link
Contributor

@Luke9389 Luke9389 Nov 18, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When I first saw this, I thought this would cause breaking behavior with translations (i.e. not translating). But then I tested it, and it totally works! Do you happen to know why this works? I'm thinking the message must get translated upstream, but I went as far as ReportActionItem and didn't see the call to translate anywhere.

Anyway, now that we don't need this method here, we can also remove the import for withLocalize, the withLocalize props, and just export the component with export default IOUQuote instead of passing it to withLocalize.

Nice catch!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/libs/ReportUtils.js#L703-L729
This is where the fragment is coming from! Which brings up a great point- this isn't using translate. I think I can fix that here as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@grgia grgia Nov 18, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

In spanish ^^ "Requested the"/"Cancelled the" and "for"/"from" should be translated right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commenting this for reference later, I think since these are considered a report action, it doesn't update with localize? I can get it to work on send, but not on page load, refresh, or switching languages- it always reverts to english. For now, I'm going to ignore since the method you pointed out would still work if we switched languages

in en.js iou:

        requestedAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Requested ${amount} from ${who}${comment && ` for ${comment}`}`,
        splitAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Split ${amount} with ${who}${comment && ` for ${comment}`}`,
        cancelledAction: ({amount, comment}) => `Cancelled the ${amount} request${comment && ` for ${comment}`}`,
        declinedAction: ({amount, comment}) => `Declined the ${amount} request${comment && ` for ${comment}`}`,
        paidAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Paid ${amount} to ${who}${comment && ` for ${comment}`}`,

in es.js iou:

        requestedAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Solicitó ${amount} de ${who}${comment && ` por ${comment}`}`,
        splitAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Split ${amount} con ${who}${comment && ` por ${comment}`}`,
        cancelledAction: ({amount, comment}) => `Canceló la solicitud de ${amount} ${comment && ` por ${comment}`}`,
        declinedAction: ({amount, comment}) => `Se rechazó la solicitud de ${amount} ${comment && ` por ${comment}`}`,
        paidAction: ({amount, comment, who}) => `Pagué ${amount} a ${who}${comment && ` por ${comment}`}`,

in reportUtils getIOUReportActionMessage()

    let iouMessage;
    switch (type) {
        case CONST.IOU.REPORT_ACTION_TYPE.CREATE:
            iouMessage = Localize.translateLocal('iou.requestedAction', {amount, who, comment});
            break;
        case CONST.IOU.REPORT_ACTION_TYPE.SPLIT:
            iouMessage = Localize.translateLocal('iou.splitAction', {amount, who});
            break;q
        case CONST.IOU.REPORT_ACTION_TYPE.CANCEL:
            iouMessage = Localize.translateLocal('iou.cancelledAction', {amount, who, comment});
            break;
        case CONST.IOU.REPORT_ACTION_TYPE.DECLINE:
            iouMessage = Localize.translateLocal('iou.declinedAction', {amount, who});
            break;
        case CONST.IOU.REPORT_ACTION_TYPE.PAY:
            iouMessage = Localize.translateLocal('iou.paidAction', {amount, who, comment});
            break;
        default:
            break;
    }

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Nov 19, 2022

Hover:
image
image

image

image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, I think that will work great!

@grgia grgia self-assigned this Nov 19, 2022
@grgia grgia marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2022 01:40
@grgia grgia requested a review from a team as a code owner November 19, 2022 01:40
@grgia grgia changed the title [WIP] Update IOU Preview Card Styles Update IOU Preview Card Styles Nov 19, 2022
@grgia grgia requested a review from Luke9389 November 19, 2022 01:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from MariaHCD and parasharrajat and removed request for a team November 19, 2022 01:41
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 19, 2022

@parasharrajat @MariaHCD One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Nov 19, 2022

@shawnborton taking this one to the finish line!

<Text style={[styles.chatItemMessage]}>
{Str.htmlDecode(fragment.text.substring(fragment.text.indexOf(' ')))}
</Text>
</Text>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
</Text>

</Text>
{props.shouldShowViewDetailsLink && (
<View key={`iouQuote-${props.action.reportActionID}-${index}`} style={[styles.textInputAndIconContainer, styles.alignItemsStart, styles.justifyContentBetween]}>
<Text>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<Text>

Comment on lines 165 to 168
secondAvatarStyle={[styles.secondAvatarInline, {borderColor: themeColors.cardBG},
props.isFocused
? {borderColor: themeColors.border}
: undefined]}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No inline styles. We can move these to styles.js

A clean syntax for conditional styles will be

[
	props.isFocused && {borderColor: themeColors.border}
]

@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ const propTypes = {
hasOutstandingIOU: PropTypes.bool,
}),

isFocused: PropTypes.bool,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing comment.

Comment on lines 60 to 63
containerStyles={[styles.cursorPointer,
props.isFocused
? styles.iouPreviewBoxHover
: undefined]}
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Nov 19, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
containerStyles={[styles.cursorPointer,
props.isFocused
? styles.iouPreviewBoxHover
: undefined]}
containerStyles={[
styles.cursorPointer,
props.isHovered && styles.iouPreviewBoxHover
]}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had to keep the original ternary (it's used in a few other files) because I kept getting console errors as react wouldn't accept the false boolean as a style, even if in an array or object

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Nov 19, 2022

What should be the interactive element here?
a) The whole message.
b) Arrow.

Previously, it was view details link and the card.

I think it should be full message now and the card. Only Arrow does not fit with our other components. Take menu items for example. They have right arrow but the whole elment is clickable.

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Nov 19, 2022

I addressed most of these suggestions, and I agree that we should follow interactive patterns with the arrow. I'll wait for @shawnborton to confirm before I fix the IOUQuote file. (arrow, message, or entire row)

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Thanks. Testing...

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Nov 23, 2022

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:58:05
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:57:54
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:55:54

🔲 iOS / Safari

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:23:24

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:20:46
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:20:37

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:17:45
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:17:35
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:09:19

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:20:06
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:19:57
Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:19:19

Screenshot 2022-11-23 05:22:54

🔲 Android / Chrome

Screenshot 2022-11-23 06:05:54
Screenshot 2022-11-23 06:07:17

🔲 Android / native

Screenshot 2022-11-23 06:37:56

parasharrajat
parasharrajat previously approved these changes Nov 23, 2022
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

cc: @Luke9389

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor Author

grgia commented Nov 23, 2022

image

Fixed with new button style

@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ const styles = {
right: -25,
borderWidth: 3,
borderRadius: 18,
borderColor: themeColors.componentBG,
borderColor: themeColors.cardBG,
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Nov 23, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How is this change related to this PR? IMO, we should pay attention to what variables we use for which style prop.

for example, here we should use a border-type variable because we are setting border. i.e. themeColors.cardBorder etc.

This will be helpful to manage the theme. Using the wrong variable can create tight coupling between components and thus more error-prone.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want to avoid adding keys to the theme file in most situations. But in this case, I agree!

@grgia grgia requested a review from parasharrajat November 23, 2022 16:29
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines -377 to +379
paddingTop: 6,
paddingTop: 12,
paddingRight: 16,
paddingBottom: 6,
paddingBottom: 12,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawnborton Can you please confirm the medium button vertical padding?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be good. We could test quickly by having a letter in the button that has an descender, like "Again" so we can make sure that the bottom part of the g isn't cut off.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on it!
image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me too. Luke is out today so feel free to merge @parasharrajat @MariaHCD

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I can't merge this. cc: @MariaHCD

@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, all! I'm giving this a final review now.

@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat Re-ran the reviewer checklist check but it's still failing. Could you verify you've used the latest one? https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Expensify/App/main/contributingGuides/REVIEWER_CHECKLIST.md

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Nov 23, 2022

I updated it thrice. Worked this time 😅

@MariaHCD MariaHCD dismissed Luke9389’s stale review November 23, 2022 17:49

All comments were addressed

@MariaHCD MariaHCD merged commit 3cf7174 into main Nov 23, 2022
@MariaHCD MariaHCD deleted the georgia-IOU-branding branch November 23, 2022 17:50
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @MariaHCD in version: 1.2.31-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

The production deploy comment failed for this PR, but this was deployed to production on v1.2.32-2 on Nov 28.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants