-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: refocus the input field on the login screen after returning to the tab #21656
Conversation
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
@parasharrajat The modifications were pretty straightforward in the |
src/components/TextInput/index.js
Outdated
this.unsubscribeVisibilityListener = Visibility.onVisibilityChange(() => { | ||
if (!Visibility.isVisible() || !this.textInput || DomUtils.getActiveElement() !== this.textInput) { | ||
return; | ||
} | ||
this.textInput.blur(); | ||
this.textInput.focus(); | ||
}); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How will this determine which input to focus when there are many on the same page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check in the early return condition ensures that it is the current active (focused) element: DomUtils.getActiveElement() !== this.textInput
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is the reference doc for document.activeElement
which is what the getActiveElement
method returns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@parasharrajat can we test this out?
@parasharrajat Did you get a chance to do another review yet? |
Not yet. But I will try to get that today. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing.
src/components/TextInput/index.js
Outdated
constructor(props) { | ||
super(props); | ||
this.unsubscribeVisibilityListener = null; | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
constructor(props) { | |
super(props); | |
this.unsubscribeVisibilityListener = null; | |
} |
Not needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed.
![]() If we want to promote consistency, we can prevent Android chrome from scrolling to the input. @akinwale Do you think, it is possible? |
@parasharrajat After doing some digging, I don't see a way to achieve this because it is the default behaviour with Android Chrome when an input field is focused. The only way to prevent the autoscroll would be to NOT re-establish focus on the text input which defeats the purpose of this PR. |
There is a way via preventing default but that will be problematic if directly apply it. No problem, I don't think this problem is affecting a lot of users thus, we should be fine. |
src/components/TextInput/index.js
Outdated
@@ -14,6 +16,21 @@ class TextInput extends React.Component { | |||
if (this.props.name) { | |||
this.textInput.setAttribute('name', this.props.name); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
this.unsubscribeVisibilityListener = Visibility.onVisibilityChange(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a explanation for these changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.8.07.43.PM.mov🔲 iOS / SafariScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.8.04.54.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / DesktopScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.7.54.48.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / ChromeScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.7.55.55.PM.mov🔲 Android / ChromeScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.7.56.39.PM.mov🔲 Android / nativeScreen.Recording.2023-07-20.at.9.40.20.PM.mov |
src/components/TextInput/index.js
Outdated
/** | ||
* A visibliity listener responsible for re-establishing focus on the TextInput in cases where a user | ||
* switches away from an MWeb tab and back. This forces the soft keyboard to be activated on Android | ||
* after switching back to the tab. See https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/20690 for more details. | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/** | |
* A visibliity listener responsible for re-establishing focus on the TextInput in cases where a user | |
* switches away from an MWeb tab and back. This forces the soft keyboard to be activated on Android | |
* after switching back to the tab. See https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/20690 for more details. | |
*/ | |
// Forcefully activate the soft keyboard when the user switches between tabs while input was focused. |
Please merge main @akinwale |
@parasharrajat Done. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issues
section above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Tests
section - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA steps
section - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReport
and notonIconClick
). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />
. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*
files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md
) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
have been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG
)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
@youssef-lr Hoping we can get this merged today. Thanks. |
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 1.3.46-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 1.3.47-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 1.3.46-2 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.47-6 🚀
|
Details
Refocuses the input field on the login screen when a user switches back from a different tab in order to keep the soft keyboard visible.
Fixed Issues
$ #20690
PROPOSAL: #20690 (comment)
Tests
Offline tests
N/A
QA Steps
Same as tests.
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issues
section aboveTests
sectionOffline steps
sectionQA steps
sectiontoggleReport
and notonIconClick
)myBool && <MyComponent />
.src/languages/*
files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md
) were followedAvatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
are working as expected)/** comment above it */
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor)this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
)Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases)ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps.Screenshots/Videos
Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
20690-android-chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
20690-ios-safari.mp4
Desktop
20690-ios-safari.mp4
iOS
20690-ios-native.mp4
Android
20690-android-native.mp4