Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When openOnAdminRoom is set, do not redirect first time users #24346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

StefanNemeth
Copy link
Contributor

@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth commented Aug 9, 2023

Details

Currently first time users will be redirected to the workspace chat report even if they should be redirected to the admin report after creating a group on staging.expensify.com.

With this change, there is a check if the admin report should be opened first even for new users, so that the workspace details and admin report stays open for them. As there will only be a change in behaviour if the openOnAdminRoom parameter is set, there shouldn't be any regressions.

Fixed Issues

$ #23566
PROPOSAL: #23566 (comment)

Tests

  1. Go to staging.expensify.com and login with a new account
  2. Go to Settings > Policies > Group
  3. Open the developer console and set CONST.URL_TO_NEW_DOT = 'http://localhost:8082/'; to the local environment so that it can be tested properly
  4. Select Free Policy
  5. Verify that User is navigated to #admins page report and also to the workspace details on the right.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Go to staging.expensify.com and login with a new account
  2. Go to Settings > Policies > Group
  3. Select Free Policy
  4. Verify that User is navigated to #admins page report and also to the workspace details on the right.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
257898236-861e3d56-847a-494c-8c5c-51ef3d1f54c1.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
android-2.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
ios.mov
Desktop

There aren't any web url handlers for the /transition route which is opened when creating the group, so the native app won't be opened.

iOS

There aren't any web url handlers for the /transition route which is opened when creating the group, so the native app won't be opened.

Android

There aren't any web url handlers for the /transition route which is opened when creating the group, so the native app won't be opened.

@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2023 20:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from sobitneupane and removed request for a team August 9, 2023 20:52
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 9, 2023

@sobitneupane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@StefanNemeth
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth force-pushed the fix/23566-admin-chat-redirect branch from 0509b0d to d1b9134 Compare August 9, 2023 21:12
@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth force-pushed the fix/23566-admin-chat-redirect branch from d1b9134 to 2e95708 Compare August 9, 2023 21:13
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.00.05.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.02.48.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.20.42.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.42.05.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.43.59.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-08-11.at.17.45.50.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dangrous August 11, 2023 12:09
Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One change, let me know if that makes sense to you or if you have questions! I think this is the best way to otherwise mirror existing behavior (just direct to a different room). Please feel free to push back if you disagree.

(report) => ReportUtils.isPolicyExpenseChat(report) && report.ownerAccountID === currentUserAccountID && report.statusNum !== CONST.REPORT.STATUS.CLOSED,
);

if (workspaceChatReport) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we might want to move this outside of the shouldNavigateToWorkspaceChat loop, and update the condition to if (workspaceChatReport || openOnAdminRoom), since we would want to set the NVP and show the popover on the first visit, even if they're going to the admins room.

Does that sound right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth Aug 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I understand your suggestion, changing it to if (workspaceChatReport || openOnAdminRoom) will cause it to have the old behaviour of navigating away.

If we want to show the popover but not navigate away, what about this approach? Maybe that's what you meant.

        const isDisplayingWorkspaceRoute = isWorkspaceRoute || exitingToWorkspaceRoute;

        const workspaceChatReport = _.find(
            allReports,
            (report) => ReportUtils.isPolicyExpenseChat(report) && report.ownerAccountID === currentUserAccountID && report.statusNum !== CONST.REPORT.STATUS.CLOSED,
        );

        if (workspaceChatReport || openOnAdminRoom) {
           // This key is only updated when we call ReconnectApp, setting it to false now allows the user to navigate normally instead of always redirecting to the workspace chat
           Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.NVP_IS_FIRST_TIME_NEW_EXPENSIFY_USER, false);
       }

        // If we already opened the workspace settings or want the admin room to stay open, do not
        // navigate away to the workspace chat report
        if (workspaceChatReport && !openOnAdminRoom && !isDisplayingWorkspaceRoute) {
            Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.getReportRoute(workspaceChatReport.reportID));
        }
        
        if (workspaceChatReport || openOnAdminRoom) {
           // If showPopoverMenu exists and returns true then it opened the Popover Menu successfully, and we can update isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser
            // so the Welcome logic doesn't run again
           if (showPopoverMenu()) {
                isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser = false;
           }
           return;
        }
        
        // ....

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah sorry my selection was bad. I meant only moving the Onyx.set and the if (showPopoverMenu())

I think we could do something like:

// All code up to this point is the same as what you have already

if (shouldNavigateToWorkspaceChat) {
	// This is the same loop as you have it currently, but removing the lines below
}

if (workspaceChatReport || openOnAdminRoom) {
	// This key is only updated when we call ReconnectApp, setting it to false now allows the user to navigate normally instead of always redirecting to the workspace chat
	Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.NVP_IS_FIRST_TIME_NEW_EXPENSIFY_USER, false);
	
	// If showPopoverMenu exists and returns true then it opened the Popover Menu successfully, and we can update isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser
	// so the Welcome logic doesn't run again
	if (showPopoverMenu()) {
	    isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser = false;
	}
}	

So a little simpler than what you suggested but pretty much the same effect.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@StefanNemeth StefanNemeth Aug 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All right good to know, I suggested something else because I thought changing the order of calling Onyx.set and Navigation.navigate would make a difference.

Though, do we really want to show the popover on the admin chat? There is one comment before calling Welcome.show: Shows Popover Menu on Workspace Chat at first sign-in.

Issue

image

If we still want to show the popover on the admin chat, one issue occurs. We will have to check whether isWorkspaceRoute is true, so we don't show the popup while the workspace settings are open (that looks a bit off). However, I don't think that the current value of isWorkspaceRoute really makes sense.

// If we are rendering the SidebarScreen at the same time as a workspace route that means we've already created a workspace via workspace/new and should not open the global
// create menu right now. We should also stay on the workspace page if that is our destination.
const topRoute = _.last(routes);
const isWorkspaceRoute = topRoute.name === 'Settings' && topRoute.params.path.includes('workspace');

My reasoning

There are two components that call Welcome.show. One is FloatingActionButtonAndPopover (responsible for the sidebar create menu) and the other one is ReportActionCompose (responsible for the chat popover menu).

FloatingActionButtonAndPopover only calls Welcome.show if the active route is within the central pane navigator or the home screen. So, in this case it is not relevant. When having the workspace settings open, the right modal navigator is active. So, if we are rendering the SidebarScreen at the same time as a workspace route (as the comment above suggests), Welcome.show will not be called. See here:

if (currentRoute && ![NAVIGATORS.CENTRAL_PANE_NAVIGATOR, SCREENS.HOME].includes(currentRoute.name)) {
return;
}
Welcome.show({routes, showCreateMenu});

ReportActionCompose does not care about the active navigator and will always execute Welcome.show if a report is displayed. However, it is used within the report screen and only has access to the central pane navigator whose routes it will forward to Welcome.show. Its only route will be the admin report, even though globally the workspace route is active. So I don't see a scenario in which isWorkspaceRoute will be true.

https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/61ab4bcf100500ce49bf1e2dfaa128f9511ea941/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionCompose.js#L260C6-L266

Possible resolutions

  1. Do not show popover on the admin chat. I don't think it the admin chat will open without the workspace settings anyway.
  2. Show popover on admin chat while workspace settings are open simultaneously.
  3. Use navigator.getParent() to access the root navigator within ReportActionCompose and do not run Welcome.show in case the right modal navigator is active (just like it was done for FloatingActionButtonAndPopover).

@dangrous What are your thoughts here?

Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous Aug 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me bring this up in Slack - I'm not entirely sure what we'd expect as the expected behavior in this case. I think you're right that it's probably fine not to show the pop up, but I want to get some other opinions.

And re: navigate vs. onyx.set, I don't think that should matter, since onyx will persist wherever, and it looks like code was already set to run after navigate, so it should continue on.

EDIT: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1692112789241719

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay so we haven't heard from QA, I think it's fine not to show the pop up.

But, we SHOULD still set these two lines even when going to the admin room, I think:
Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.NVP_IS_FIRST_TIME_NEW_EXPENSIFY_USER, false);
and
isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser = false;

Do you think that makes sense? If so, can you make that update and then we can merge?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense to me. I updated the code so Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.NVP_IS_FIRST_TIME_NEW_EXPENSIFY_USER, false); and isFirstTimeNewExpensifyUser = false; will be called when going to the admin room and the logic is the same as before otherwise.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

dangrous commented Aug 16, 2023

I'm asking QA on the issue whether the pop up is supposed to be open.

The more I think about it, the more I agree with you @StefanNemeth that we should just not show the pop up, but I'd like a bit of confirmation.

If we don't hear anything soon I think we can go ahead and merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me! @sobitneupane can you give this one more look through and test? Changed a bit since your review. Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update @StefanNemeth.

Changes look good and tests well.

Screen.Recording.2023-08-21.at.14.45.22.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dangrous August 21, 2023 09:04
@dangrous dangrous merged commit 8cfeafb into Expensify:main Aug 21, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 1.3.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.56-24 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants