-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for double paste in composer after function component mig #25419
Merged
bondydaa
merged 1 commit into
Expensify:main
from
daordonez11:fix-double-paste-composer
Aug 17, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is original code before function component refactor.
But I think it's better to set
textInput
as target as long as it doesn't cause any issues.@bondydaa what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah I was wondering about using
document
as well.my gut says having it on the dom element instead of the document object is probably better, in the event we add other global paste type handlers in the future so it won't create a conflict in that event.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
asked in open source here https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1692292251654389
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm previously I fixed an error where multiple composers existed at the same time like editing multiple messages and that's why handlePaste haves some logic of visibility. I'm not sure if maybe there is some logic behind that but I would prefer not to mess with it in case it does. Although if we move it to textInput we coudla void that logic of focus.
cc @mountiny in case you know there is logic about this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI Here is the issue of multiple composers #23502
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can go with this solution (document listener) for now as deploy blocker and discussion may not end up very soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 thanks for that extra context and yeah agree let's go with this for now, we can always fix it later if needed too. this stuff isn't being carved into stone 😂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
YEah probably that would've been a possible solution for #22803 maybe @Santhosh-Sellavel can give us a clue on why it was fixed in document instead of textInput
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a regression from #23359
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We used document only earlier