-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TS migration] Migrate 'Task' page to TypeScript #35484
Merged
marcochavezf
merged 11 commits into
Expensify:main
from
pasyukevich:feature/migrate-task-edit
Mar 7, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9a0d540
[TS migration] Migrate 'Task' page to TypeScript
pasyukevich cf150a2
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich 8344608
update types
pasyukevich d57df4f
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich 6c38232
fix types
pasyukevich be5a749
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich b6ce9f1
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich d21a39f
address comments
pasyukevich 1faa334
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich 82612a8
Merge branch 'main' into feature/migrate-task-edit
pasyukevich dd2e3bf
fix types
pasyukevich File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Boolean is better since it is straight forward conversion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The convention is to use !! across files, I agree with @kubabutkiewicz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't have such a convention in the contributional guidelines.
I think using
Boolean
is better as you always understand what is going on and do not need to focus on the quantity of!