Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage #42328

Closed

Conversation

hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga commented May 17, 2024

Details

Adds the new Switch component to enable/disable "Require tags" on the parent tag level when there are multi-level tags.

Fixed Issues

$ #41374
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests / QA Steps

  1. Create a workspace, enable the accounting feature on the More Features page, and connect to QBO on the Accounting page.
  2. Go to the tags page. You should see Classes and Customers/Projects imported.
  3. Click Classes. Confirm that you see the Switcher component with the text Members must tag all expenses
  4. Confirm you can toggle on / off this option
  5. Log out of the app. Log back in. Confirm that the on/off selection is still preserved.
  6. Do the same thing for Customers/Projects

Offline tests

Do the same test as the above. You should do Steps 1 and 2 while online. and the rest offline.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I verified that similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • I verified that all props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • I verified that each file is named correctly
  • I verified that each component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • I verified that the only data being stored in component state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • In component if we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • I verified that component internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • I verified that all JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • I verified that each component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga self-assigned this May 17, 2024
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2024 03:08
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team May 17, 2024 03:08
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 17, 2024

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title Hayata add switch to require tags per parent level Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage May 17, 2024
Comment on lines 249 to 258
<View style={[styles.pv4, styles.ph5]}>
<View style={[styles.flexRow, styles.mb5, styles.mr2, styles.alignItemsCenter, styles.justifyContentBetween]}>
<Text style={[styles.textNormal]}>{translate('workspace.tags.requiresTag')}</Text>
<Switch
isOn={Boolean(policyTagList?.required)}
accessibilityLabel={translate('workspace.tags.requiresTag')}
onToggle={(on) => Policy.setWorkspaceTagListRequired(policyID, route.params.orderWeight ?? 0, on)}
/>
</View>
</View>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use ToggleSettingOptionRow and pass errors and pending action

* When the tags are imported as multi level tags, the index of the top
* most tag list item
*/
tagListIndex?: number;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not optional

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage [HOLD Web-E PR]Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage May 17, 2024
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title [HOLD Web-E PR]Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage [HOLD Web-E PR] Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage May 17, 2024
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title [HOLD Web-E PR] Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage [HOLD Web-E PR #42066] Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage May 17, 2024
Comment on lines 3 to 6
/**
* When the tags are imported as multi level tags, the index of the top
* most tag list item
*/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove comment, not needed

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for the quick review. I'm working on this right now. I'll let you know once the PR is ready for review 😄

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR not ready yet for review 🙇

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the base branch from main to qbo-freeze-branch May 21, 2024 00:27
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure why TypeScript checks are failing here. The failed code is not a part changed by this PR.

I merged the latest main but it's still failing. 🤔 @s77rt do you have any idea?

Screenshot 2024-05-22 at 12 09 37 PM

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 22, 2024

@hayata-suenaga I don't see the commit where you merged main or qbo-freeze-branch, can you double check

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

When I tried to merge the main branch this morning, there was no update on the main branch (we have been having merge freeze so it makes sense). Now I see some changes. I'll merge and see if that is going to fix the issue.

Screenshot 2024-05-22 at 1 33 39 PM

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2024 18:27
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title [HOLD Web-E PR #42066] Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage Add a switch to toggle on/off "require tags" on WorkspaceViewTagsPage May 29, 2024
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the base branch from qbo-freeze-branch to main May 30, 2024 05:22
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 30, 2024

@hayata-suenaga You merged both main and qbo-freeze-branch into hayata-add-switch-to-require-tags-per-parent-level thus targeting any of these branches will have other unwanted commits. I think want you are looking for is to revert the qbo-freeze-branch merge i.e. a367437

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hayata-suenaga You merged both main and qbo-freeze-branch into hayata-add-switch-to-require-tags-per-parent-level thus targeting any of these branches will have other unwanted commits. I think want you are looking for is to revert the qbo-freeze-branch merge i.e. a367437

yep that is what I was working on last night but was having an issue with reverting the merge. I'll try this again now.

@trjExpensify trjExpensify mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
49 tasks
Hayata Suenaga added 2 commits May 31, 2024 10:07
…r-parent-level"

This reverts commit 6e29856, reversing
changes made to a367437.
…quire-tags-per-parent-level"

This reverts commit a367437, reversing
changes made to afdda1a.
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga force-pushed the hayata-add-switch-to-require-tags-per-parent-level branch from bfc9344 to 35992e8 Compare May 31, 2024 20:38
…r-parent-level"

This reverts commit afdda1a, reversing
changes made to 346f796.
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

keep working on this branch/PR instead -> #42952

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

closing this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants