-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nu-93 #2
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates involve restructuring and enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (5)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional comments not posted (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/audio_player.rs (1)
Line range hint
57-89
: The error handling inplay_audio
function is robust, but ensure that the error messages are clear and provide enough context for debugging. Consider adding more specific error descriptions where possible.- LabeledError::new(err.to_string()).with_label("audio stream exception", call.head) + LabeledError::new(format!("Failed to create audio stream: {}", err)).with_label("audio stream exception", call.head)
pub struct SoundMetaSetCmd; | ||
impl SimplePluginCommand for SoundMetaSetCmd { | ||
type Plugin = Sound; | ||
|
||
pub fn parse_meta(call: &EvaluatedCall) -> Result<Value, LabeledError> { | ||
fn name(&self) -> &str { | ||
"sound meta set" | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn signature(&self) -> nu_protocol::Signature { | ||
Signature::new("sound meta set") | ||
.required("File Path", SyntaxShape::Filepath, "file to update") | ||
.required_named("key", SyntaxShape::String, "id3 key", Some('k')) | ||
.required_named("value", SyntaxShape::String, "id3 value", Some('v')) | ||
.category(Category::Experimental) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn usage(&self) -> &str { | ||
"set a id3 frame on an audio file" | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn run( | ||
&self, | ||
_plugin: &Self::Plugin, | ||
_engine: &nu_plugin::EngineInterface, | ||
call: &EvaluatedCall, | ||
_input: &Value, | ||
) -> Result<Value, nu_protocol::LabeledError> { | ||
audio_meta_set(call) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The output from the executed script shows that other command structs in the codebase, such as those in src/sound_make.rs
and src/audio_player.rs
, implement similar methods (name
, signature
, examples
, usage
) as those in SoundMetaSetCmd
. This suggests a consistency in the method implementation style across different parts of the application.
However, it's important to note that the SoundMetaSetCmd
struct does not implement an examples
method, which is present in the other command structs. This could potentially be an oversight or a deliberate design choice depending on the requirements or the simplicity of the command.
Given this information, the implementation of SoundMetaSetCmd
mostly aligns with the rest of the application in terms of method structure, but the absence of the examples
method might need to be addressed if it is expected for all command structs to provide examples for better user guidance.
Final Assessment:
- The methods
name
,signature
, andusage
inSoundMetaSetCmd
are consistent with other parts of the application. - The absence of an
examples
method inSoundMetaSetCmd
might be an area to consider for improvement if consistency and comprehensive user guidance are priorities.
Action Points:
- Confirm whether the absence of the
examples
method inSoundMetaSetCmd
is intentional. - If unintentional, consider adding an
examples
method to align with other command structs.
Analysis chain
The introduction of SoundMetaSetCmd
struct is a positive change for encapsulating audio metadata setting functionality. However, ensure that the method implementations like name
, signature
, examples
, and usage
are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundMetaSetCmd` with the rest of the application.
# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/audio_meta.rs'
Length of output: 768
pub struct SoundMetaGetCmd; | ||
impl SimplePluginCommand for SoundMetaGetCmd { | ||
type Plugin = Sound; | ||
|
||
fn name(&self) -> &str { | ||
"sound meta" | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn signature(&self) -> Signature { | ||
Signature::new("sound meta") | ||
.named( | ||
"all", | ||
SyntaxShape::Nothing, | ||
"List all possible frame names", | ||
Some('a'), | ||
) | ||
.required("File Path", SyntaxShape::Filepath, "file to play") | ||
.category(Category::Experimental) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn usage(&self) -> &str { | ||
"get duration and meta data of an audio file" | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn run( | ||
&self, | ||
_plugin: &Self::Plugin, | ||
_engine: &nu_plugin::EngineInterface, | ||
call: &EvaluatedCall, | ||
_input: &Value, | ||
) -> Result<Value, nu_protocol::LabeledError> { | ||
if let Ok(true) = call.has_flag("all") { | ||
return Ok(get_meta_records(call.head)); | ||
} | ||
parse_meta(call) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The review comment suggests verifying the consistency of method implementations in the SoundMetaGetCmd
struct with the rest of the application. The methods of interest are name
, signature
, examples
, and usage
.
From the script output, it's evident that similar methods are implemented in other parts of the application, specifically in src/sound_make.rs
and src/audio_player.rs
. These files contain methods with the same names and return types, indicating a pattern of implementation across different command structs.
However, the SoundMetaGetCmd
struct in src/audio_meta.rs
does not implement the examples
method, which is present in the other command structs (src/sound_make.rs
and src/audio_player.rs
). This discrepancy could suggest an inconsistency in how command structs are implemented throughout the application.
Given this observation, it's important to highlight the absence of the examples
method in SoundMetaGetCmd
and recommend its inclusion for consistency with other command structs in the application.
Final Response:
The review of the SoundMetaGetCmd
struct in src/audio_meta.rs
shows that while the name
, signature
, and usage
methods are consistent with other parts of the application, the examples
method is notably absent. This is inconsistent with the implementation in other command structs like those in src/sound_make.rs
and src/audio_player.rs
, which do include an examples
method.
- Recommendation: Consider implementing the
examples
method inSoundMetaGetCmd
to maintain consistency across command structs in the application.
Analysis chain
The introduction of SoundMetaGetCmd
struct is a positive change for encapsulating audio metadata getting functionality. Ensure that the method implementations like name
, signature
, examples
, and usage
are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundMetaGetCmd` with the rest of the application.
# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/audio_meta.rs'
Length of output: 768
Bump nu-protocol and plugin versions to 0.93
Bump id3 version to 1.13.1
closes #1
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
chrono
library.Enhancements
Refactor
Bug Fixes