Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nu-93 #2

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 4, 2024
Merged

Nu-93 #2

merged 3 commits into from
May 4, 2024

Conversation

FMotalleb
Copy link
Owner

@FMotalleb FMotalleb commented May 4, 2024

Bump nu-protocol and plugin versions to 0.93
Bump id3 version to 1.13.1
closes #1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new audio player commands and enhanced metadata handling for a more robust audio experience.
    • Added chronological functionalities with the implementation of the chrono library.
  • Enhancements

    • Updated dependencies for better performance and compatibility.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured audio commands into specific command structures for improved clarity and maintainability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted audio metadata access modifiers to ensure consistent functionality across different modules.

@FMotalleb FMotalleb merged commit 461b53f into main May 4, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates involve restructuring and enhancing the Sound plugin and related modules in a Rust project. Key changes include updating dependencies, modifying visibility and structure of functions, and introducing specific command structs for handling different sound-related functionalities, aligning with the updated plugin architecture.

Changes

Files Summary of Changes
Cargo.toml, src/sound.rs, src/sound_make.rs Updated dependencies, restructured commands within the Sound plugin, and encapsulated functionalities into specific command structs.
src/audio_meta.rs, src/audio_player.rs Modified function visibility and added new command implementations.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Error when plugin add [#1] The changes do not address the decoding error issue described.

🐇✨
In the land of code, where the bits align,
A rabbit hopped through, leaving changes behind.
With a flip and a twirl, dependencies updated,
Commands restructured, no effort abated.
Celebrate we do, with a hop and a cheer,
For the code is now sleek, and the path is clear! 🎉🚀
🐇✨


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c981f95 and d73259f.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (5)
  • Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
  • src/audio_meta.rs (5 hunks)
  • src/audio_player.rs (5 hunks)
  • src/sound.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/sound_make.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/sound.rs (2)

1-6: Ensure that the new imports align with the project's dependency management and coding standards.

Verification successful

The shell script execution confirms that the newly imported modules (SoundMetaGetCmd, SoundMetaSetCmd, SoundPlayCmd, SoundBeepCmd, SoundMakeCmd) are indeed used in the file src/sound.rs. This aligns with the review comment's focus on verifying the appropriate use of these imports in the context of the refactoring effort to improve modularity and clarity in command handling.

Since the script output indicates that these modules are present in src/sound.rs, there is no evidence of unused imports among the newly added ones. This suggests that the changes align well with the project's dependency management and coding standards as intended.

Conclusion:
The verification confirms that the new imports are used appropriately within src/sound.rs, and there are no unused imports among them. This supports the refactoring goals mentioned in the review comment.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the newly imported modules are used appropriately and check for any unused imports.

# Test: Search for usage of newly imported modules. Expect: Usage instances in the current file.
rg --type rust --files-with-matches 'SoundMetaGetCmd|SoundMetaSetCmd|SoundPlayCmd|SoundBeepCmd|SoundMakeCmd' src/sound.rs

Length of output: 136


15-21: The refactoring to use specific command structs enhances modularity and clarity. Ensure that all instances where these commands are used are updated to reflect these changes.

Verification successful

The investigation into the usage of SimplePluginCommand across various files (src/sound_make.rs, src/audio_player.rs, src/audio_meta.rs) reveals that it is consistently implemented in the context of new command structures like SoundPlayCmd, SoundMakeCmd, SoundBeepCmd, SoundMetaSetCmd, and SoundMetaGetCmd. This indicates that SimplePluginCommand is an integral part of the new struct-based approach, aligning with the refactoring goals mentioned in the review comment.

  • src/sound_make.rs: Implements SimplePluginCommand for SoundMakeCmd and SoundBeepCmd.
  • src/audio_player.rs: Implements SimplePluginCommand for SoundPlayCmd.
  • src/audio_meta.rs: Implements SimplePluginCommand for SoundMetaSetCmd and SoundMetaGetCmd.

These findings confirm that the refactoring has been applied consistently and appropriately across the codebase.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all instances where these commands are used reflect the new struct-based approach.

# Test: Search for outdated command usage in the project. Expect: No occurrences of the old generic `PluginCommand` usage.
rg --type rust 'PluginCommand' --glob '!src/sound.rs'

Length of output: 604



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if `SimplePluginCommand` is part of the new struct-based approach or if it's outdated.

# Test: Search for the definition and usage context of `SimplePluginCommand` to determine its relevance to the new changes.
rg --type rust 'SimplePluginCommand' --files-with-matches

Length of output: 113



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the definition and contextual usage of `SimplePluginCommand` to understand its role in the new struct-based approach.

# Test: Search for the definition, documentation, and comments related to `SimplePluginCommand`.
rg --type rust -C 5 'SimplePluginCommand' src/sound_make.rs src/audio_player.rs src/audio_meta.rs

Length of output: 3044

src/audio_player.rs (1)

9-55: The introduction of SoundPlayCmd struct is a positive change for encapsulating audio play functionality. However, ensure that the method implementations like name, signature, examples, and usage are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.

Verification successful

The review of the SoundPlayCmd struct in src/audio_player.rs shows that its method implementations (name, signature, examples, and usage) are consistent with similar structures found in other parts of the application, such as sound_make.rs and audio_meta.rs. This consistency supports the integration of the new command structure for audio playing functionality within the existing framework.

  • The methods name, signature, and usage are uniformly implemented across the compared files.
  • The examples method, while not present in every instance, is implemented where relevant, suggesting flexibility based on specific command requirements.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundPlayCmd` with the rest of the application.

# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/audio_player.rs'

Length of output: 855

src/sound_make.rs (2)

10-59: The introduction of SoundMakeCmd struct is a positive change for encapsulating sound creation functionality. However, ensure that the method implementations like name, signature, examples, and usage are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.

Verification successful

The method implementations in SoundMakeCmd are consistent with those in other parts of the application, as evidenced by the similar patterns and coding standards used in files like src/audio_player.rs and src/audio_meta.rs. This confirms that the new struct adheres to the established coding practices within the application.

  • src/audio_player.rs and src/audio_meta.rs both implement methods such as name, signature, examples, and usage in a manner similar to SoundMakeCmd.
Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundMakeCmd` with the rest of the application.

# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/sound_make.rs'

Length of output: 637


61-93: The introduction of SoundBeepCmd struct is a positive change for encapsulating beep sound functionality. Ensure that the method implementations like name, signature, examples, and usage are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.

Verification successful

The output from the executed script shows that the methods name, signature, examples, and usage are indeed implemented in other command structures within the application, specifically in src/audio_player.rs and src/audio_meta.rs. The patterns and coding standards appear to be consistent with the implementation in SoundBeepCmd as described in the review comment.

  • All command structures implement the name and signature methods.
  • The examples method is implemented in both SoundBeepCmd and audio_player.rs, but not in audio_meta.rs.
  • The usage method is consistently implemented across the different command structures.

Given this information, the implementation of SoundBeepCmd aligns well with the rest of the application in terms of method structure and coding standards.

Conclusion:
The SoundBeepCmd struct's method implementations are consistent with other parts of the application, adhering to similar patterns and coding standards.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundBeepCmd` with the rest of the application.

# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/sound_make.rs'

Length of output: 637


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/audio_player.rs (1)

Line range hint 57-89: The error handling in play_audio function is robust, but ensure that the error messages are clear and provide enough context for debugging. Consider adding more specific error descriptions where possible.

-                LabeledError::new(err.to_string()).with_label("audio stream exception", call.head)
+                LabeledError::new(format!("Failed to create audio stream: {}", err)).with_label("audio stream exception", call.head)

Comment on lines +10 to +39
pub struct SoundMetaSetCmd;
impl SimplePluginCommand for SoundMetaSetCmd {
type Plugin = Sound;

pub fn parse_meta(call: &EvaluatedCall) -> Result<Value, LabeledError> {
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"sound meta set"
}

fn signature(&self) -> nu_protocol::Signature {
Signature::new("sound meta set")
.required("File Path", SyntaxShape::Filepath, "file to update")
.required_named("key", SyntaxShape::String, "id3 key", Some('k'))
.required_named("value", SyntaxShape::String, "id3 value", Some('v'))
.category(Category::Experimental)
}

fn usage(&self) -> &str {
"set a id3 frame on an audio file"
}

fn run(
&self,
_plugin: &Self::Plugin,
_engine: &nu_plugin::EngineInterface,
call: &EvaluatedCall,
_input: &Value,
) -> Result<Value, nu_protocol::LabeledError> {
audio_meta_set(call)
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The output from the executed script shows that other command structs in the codebase, such as those in src/sound_make.rs and src/audio_player.rs, implement similar methods (name, signature, examples, usage) as those in SoundMetaSetCmd. This suggests a consistency in the method implementation style across different parts of the application.

However, it's important to note that the SoundMetaSetCmd struct does not implement an examples method, which is present in the other command structs. This could potentially be an oversight or a deliberate design choice depending on the requirements or the simplicity of the command.

Given this information, the implementation of SoundMetaSetCmd mostly aligns with the rest of the application in terms of method structure, but the absence of the examples method might need to be addressed if it is expected for all command structs to provide examples for better user guidance.

Final Assessment:

  • The methods name, signature, and usage in SoundMetaSetCmd are consistent with other parts of the application.
  • The absence of an examples method in SoundMetaSetCmd might be an area to consider for improvement if consistency and comprehensive user guidance are priorities.

Action Points:

  • Confirm whether the absence of the examples method in SoundMetaSetCmd is intentional.
  • If unintentional, consider adding an examples method to align with other command structs.
Analysis chain

The introduction of SoundMetaSetCmd struct is a positive change for encapsulating audio metadata setting functionality. However, ensure that the method implementations like name, signature, examples, and usage are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundMetaSetCmd` with the rest of the application.

# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/audio_meta.rs'

Length of output: 768

Comment on lines +41 to +77
pub struct SoundMetaGetCmd;
impl SimplePluginCommand for SoundMetaGetCmd {
type Plugin = Sound;

fn name(&self) -> &str {
"sound meta"
}

fn signature(&self) -> Signature {
Signature::new("sound meta")
.named(
"all",
SyntaxShape::Nothing,
"List all possible frame names",
Some('a'),
)
.required("File Path", SyntaxShape::Filepath, "file to play")
.category(Category::Experimental)
}

fn usage(&self) -> &str {
"get duration and meta data of an audio file"
}

fn run(
&self,
_plugin: &Self::Plugin,
_engine: &nu_plugin::EngineInterface,
call: &EvaluatedCall,
_input: &Value,
) -> Result<Value, nu_protocol::LabeledError> {
if let Ok(true) = call.has_flag("all") {
return Ok(get_meta_records(call.head));
}
parse_meta(call)
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The review comment suggests verifying the consistency of method implementations in the SoundMetaGetCmd struct with the rest of the application. The methods of interest are name, signature, examples, and usage.

From the script output, it's evident that similar methods are implemented in other parts of the application, specifically in src/sound_make.rs and src/audio_player.rs. These files contain methods with the same names and return types, indicating a pattern of implementation across different command structs.

However, the SoundMetaGetCmd struct in src/audio_meta.rs does not implement the examples method, which is present in the other command structs (src/sound_make.rs and src/audio_player.rs). This discrepancy could suggest an inconsistency in how command structs are implemented throughout the application.

Given this observation, it's important to highlight the absence of the examples method in SoundMetaGetCmd and recommend its inclusion for consistency with other command structs in the application.

Final Response:

The review of the SoundMetaGetCmd struct in src/audio_meta.rs shows that while the name, signature, and usage methods are consistent with other parts of the application, the examples method is notably absent. This is inconsistent with the implementation in other command structs like those in src/sound_make.rs and src/audio_player.rs, which do include an examples method.

  • Recommendation: Consider implementing the examples method in SoundMetaGetCmd to maintain consistency across command structs in the application.
Analysis chain

The introduction of SoundMetaGetCmd struct is a positive change for encapsulating audio metadata getting functionality. Ensure that the method implementations like name, signature, examples, and usage are correctly reflecting the intended functionality and are consistent with the rest of the application.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of method implementations in `SoundMetaGetCmd` with the rest of the application.

# Test: Search for similar method implementations in other command structs to ensure consistency. Expect: Similar patterns and coding standards.
rg --type rust 'fn name|fn signature|fn examples|fn usage' --glob '!src/audio_meta.rs'

Length of output: 768

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

error when plugin add
1 participant