Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #1 rename to falkordb #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024
Merged

fix #1 rename to falkordb #2

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2024

Conversation

gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

@gkorland gkorland commented Mar 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Renamed the package from redisgraph to falkordb across various files to reflect the new branding.
    • Minor adjustments in function calls and struct field formatting for improved clarity and consistency.

@gkorland gkorland requested a review from swilly22 March 30, 2024 16:56
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The project underwent a significant rebranding, transitioning from redisgraph to falkordb across various files. This involved updating package names, adjusting function calls for better readability, and ensuring consistency in naming conventions to align with the new identity, FalkorDB.

Changes

Files Change Summary
client_test.go, record.go Renamed package to falkordb; adjusted NodeNew function call.
edge.go, graph.go, node.go, path.go Renamed package to falkordb.
example_graph_test.go Replaced RedisGraph references with FalkorDB; updated imports.
query_result.go, utils.go Renamed package to falkordb; formatting and spacing adjustments.

Possibly related issues

Poem

In the realm of code, where logic does abide,
A rabbit hopped along, with a spring in its stride.
From redisgraph to falkordb, a change took flight,
🌟 Transforming names, in the moonlight.
"To FalkorDB we go," it said with glee,
A leap towards the future, for you and me. 🚀
🐰💻🌿

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b0ad09 and 962a41d.
Files selected for processing (9)
  • client_test.go (2 hunks)
  • edge.go (1 hunks)
  • example_graph_test.go (4 hunks)
  • graph.go (1 hunks)
  • node.go (1 hunks)
  • path.go (1 hunks)
  • query_result.go (3 hunks)
  • record.go (1 hunks)
  • utils.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • path.go
  • record.go
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (6)
node.go (6)

1-1: The package renaming from redisgraph to falkordb is correctly implemented.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [13-24]

The implementation of NodeNew correctly handles the case where properties is nil, which is a good practice to avoid potential nil dereference errors.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [27-29]

The implementation of SetProperty correctly assigns or updates a property on the node.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [31-34]

The implementation of GetProperty correctly retrieves a property value by key, safely handling missing keys by defaulting to nil.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [36-48]

The implementation of the String method efficiently constructs a string representation of the node, following good practices for readability and performance.


1-4: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [50-71]

The implementation of the Encode method correctly and efficiently constructs an encoded string representation of the node, handling aliases, labels, and properties appropriately.

@swilly22 swilly22 merged commit 9d77a9f into master Mar 31, 2024
@swilly22 swilly22 deleted the rename-falkordb branch March 31, 2024 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants