Fix type alias file upload parameters

[carlbrugger]

Reapplying changes from PR #6 with an update to .fernignore to prevent overwriting.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request makes two primary changes. First, it updates the .fernignore file by appending an entry for files/client.go to the existing ignore list. Second, it modifies the Upload function in files/client.go by replacing calls to writer.WriteJSON with writer.WriteField for several fields. Additionally, the import statements in this file have been reorganized without affecting the overall control flow or exported public entities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.fernignore	Added files/client.go to the list of files to ignore, expanding the scope of files excluded from modification by Fern.
files/client.go	Updated the Upload function to replace WriteJSON with WriteField for spaceId, environmentId, mode, and origin; reorganized import statements.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as Upload Function
    participant W as Writer
    U->>W: WriteField("spaceId")
    U->>W: WriteField("environmentId")
    U->>W: WriteField("mode")
    U->>W: WriteField("origin")
    W-->>U: Field processed

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• 🌿 Fix type alias file upload parameters #6: Modifications in the Upload method, specifically altering field serialization in multipart requests by replacing WriteJSON with WriteField, provide a clear code-level connection.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fcf5de7 and 5f18b22.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .fernignore (1 hunks)
• files/client.go (3 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .fernignore

🔇 Additional comments (2)

files/client.go (2)

8-10: LGTM! Import organization follows Go conventions.

The reorganization of imports follows the Go convention of separating standard library imports from third-party imports with a blank line.

---

108-128: LGTM! Appropriate use of WriteField for string parameters.

The change from WriteJSON to WriteField for simple string fields is correct, while keeping WriteJSON for the complex actions field. This aligns with the PR objective of fixing type alias parameters.

Let's verify the types of these fields in the request struct:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! The field types are correctly handled.

• The SpaceId and EnvironmentId fields are type aliases for string.
• The Mode and Origin fields are pointers to string types.
• Using WriteField for these simple fields is appropriate, while actions correctly continues to use WriteJSON for complex types.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the types of the fields in CreateFileRequest struct
ast-grep --pattern $'type CreateFileRequest struct {
  $$$
  SpaceId string
  EnvironmentId string
  Mode $_
  Actions $_
  Origin $_
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 143

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Re-run search for the definition of CreateFileRequest using ripgrep to obtain context
rg -C 10 'type CreateFileRequest struct'

Length of output: 996

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions for SpaceId, EnvironmentId, Mode, and FileOrigin in the repository
rg -n '^type SpaceId\s' && \
rg -n '^type EnvironmentId\s' && \
rg -n '^type Mode\s' && \
rg -n '^type FileOrigin\s'

Length of output: 257

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.