Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Add source value array for fwi in wave solvers #3502

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

acitrain
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is adding an array to store the values of the sources in time.
This array is useful for FWI and pygeos

@acitrain acitrain added ci: run CUDA builds Allows to triggers (costly) CUDA jobs flag: ready for review flag: requires rebaseline Requires rebaseline branch in integratedTests ci: run code coverage enables running of the code coverage CI jobs labels Dec 20, 2024
@acitrain acitrain self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.71%. Comparing base (a8a57c7) to head (a060ea9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3502      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.78%   56.71%   -0.07%     
===========================================
  Files         1154     1153       -1     
  Lines       100057   100036      -21     
===========================================
- Hits         56815    56737      -78     
- Misses       43242    43299      +57     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci: run code coverage enables running of the code coverage CI jobs ci: run CUDA builds Allows to triggers (costly) CUDA jobs flag: ready for review flag: requires rebaseline Requires rebaseline branch in integratedTests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants