Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

49 update historical data #50

Conversation

bucketteOfIvy
Copy link
Collaborator

@bucketteOfIvy bucketteOfIvy commented Jun 21, 2023

Removed an API key found lurking in one of the code files, and transformed the 2010 shapefiles to more closely align with their 2018 equivalents. Specifically:

  • Dropped duplicate columns (e.g. tracts2010 had two columns [STATE and STATEFP] containing the same data)
  • Renamed and reorganized attribute data to align with the OEPS Geography file metadata and 2018 shapefile attribute data (e.g. TRACT to TRACTCE, and GEO_ID to AFFGEOID).
  • Added a GEOID column based on the AFFGEOID column.
  • Added state abbreviations to the state file, pulled from the 2018 file.
  • Changed LSAD column for states2010 from NA to "00", which is the LSAD designation for states.

The relevant R script is also included.

@bucketteOfIvy bucketteOfIvy changed the base branch from main to OEPS-historical-data June 21, 2023 21:31
@bucketteOfIvy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Woops, this was not an attempt to merge into main

@mradamcox mradamcox marked this pull request as draft June 22, 2023 16:53
@bucketteOfIvy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looked over my code and this feels ready to commit!

@bucketteOfIvy bucketteOfIvy marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2023 20:30
@mradamcox mradamcox merged commit d9f6ac8 into GeoDaCenter:OEPS-historical-data Jul 17, 2023
@mradamcox
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good @bucketteOfIvy, Next is to finally merge the historical data branch into main.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants