Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

relative links in WMS attribution fields #127

Closed
dwins opened this issue Nov 17, 2010 · 2 comments
Closed

relative links in WMS attribution fields #127

dwins opened this issue Nov 17, 2010 · 2 comments
Milestone
1.2 Release

Comments

@dwins
Copy link
Contributor

dwins commented Nov 17, 2010

They should be absolute instead. (I'm talking about the link that gets saved with the layer configuration in GeoServer.)
@ingenieroariel
Copy link
Member

GeoNode doesn't seem to be including attribution links at all now... That makes this a regression.

@jj0hns0n
Copy link
Contributor

Im looking at this on a fresh 1.2alpha2 install and there are most certainly metadata links in GeoServer and they are absolute, and the links are valid see #115 (i.e. I can just drop them in a browser window and I get back the XML from GeoNetwork)

https://skitch.com/ortelius/ebuyg/geoserver-edit-layer

@dwins and @ingenieroariel can you guys still replicate this? If not, lets close it.

@jj0hns0n jj0hns0n mentioned this issue Jun 18, 2012
Closed
goudine pushed a commit to goudine/geonode that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2018
@JivanAmara @jj0hns0n
Remove development-only comment. (GeoNode#127)
076b4d5
travislbrundage pushed a commit to travislbrundage/geonode that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2018
@bitner
fix geonode internal proxy to return vald response (GeoNode#127)
2eea960
marthamareal pushed a commit to marthamareal/geonode that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2021
@luorlandini
Client - Filter panel state should be consistent with the latest user…
189fbcc 
… action (GeoNode#127)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.2 Release
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ingenieroariel @dwins @jj0hns0n