Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removing dynamic #4952

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged

removing dynamic #4952

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Jan 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated sitemap generation API route configuration to modify dynamic rendering behavior.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 20, 2025 8:13pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a modification to the configuration of the generate-sitemap.ts API route. Specifically, the dynamic: 'force-dynamic' line has been removed from the config export. This change potentially impacts the dynamic rendering behavior of the sitemap generation endpoint, which could affect how the page is cached and revalidated.

Changes

File Change Summary
pages/api/generate-sitemap.ts Removed dynamic: 'force-dynamic' from the configuration export

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lovelgeorge99

Poem

🐰 A sitemap's dance, config refined,
Dynamic lines gently unsigned,
Rendering paths now set to glide,
With CodeRabbit's algorithmic pride!
Hop, hop, configuration light! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c41cb93 and 747fb1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/api/generate-sitemap.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • pages/api/generate-sitemap.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit 73c3958 into develop Jan 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the add_estimated_timer branch January 20, 2025 20:15
kkatusic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
This reverts commit 73c3958, reversing
changes made to c41cb93.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants