Optimize check project verification #1637
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the robustness of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NotificationCenterAdapter
participant ProjectRepository
User->>NotificationCenterAdapter: Trigger Notification Methods
NotificationCenterAdapter->>ProjectRepository: Fetch Project Details
ProjectRepository->>NotificationCenterAdapter: Return Project Details with Updated Filters
NotificationCenterAdapter->>User: Send Notification
User->>CronJob: Trigger Project Verification Check
CronJob->>ProjectRepository: Check Project Updates
ProjectRepository->>CronJob: Return Project Update Details
CronJob->>NotificationCenterAdapter: Notify User if Necessary
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/adapters/notifications/NotificationCenterAdapter.ts (1)
Line range hint
920-926: The else clause here is unnecessary as previous branches of the condition break early. Consider removing it to simplify the control flow.- else { - ... - }
| if ( | ||
| !project || | ||
| !project.projectUpdates || | ||
| project.projectUpdates.length === 0 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider simplifying the condition by using optional chaining for project and projectUpdates.
- if (
- !project ||
- !project.projectUpdates ||
- project.projectUpdates.length === 0
- ) {
+ if (!project?.projectUpdates?.length) {
return;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ( | |
| !project || | |
| !project.projectUpdates || | |
| project.projectUpdates.length === 0 | |
| ) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!project?.projectUpdates?.length) { | |
| return; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/services/cronJobs/checkProjectVerificationStatus.test.ts (2)
Line range hint
46-46: Consider updating this test case to use.toDate()forprojectUpdateCreationDateto maintain consistency with other test cases.
Line range hint
64-64: Update this test case to use.toDate()forprojectUpdateCreationDatefor consistent date handling across all test cases.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Tests