core(seo): support spanish in link-text audit

[Markel]

I have added a couple of translations for the Links Do Not Have Descriptive Text audit in Spanish.

Note that in Spanish there is this symbol: ´. People forget to write it so we may take into account these errors, let me know your opinion.

Related Issues/PRs
#5322 but in Spanish

[patrickhulce]

Thanks very much for the contribution @MarkelFe!

Core team: We sortof accepted the Japanese contribution without a lot of process, but if we're going to be accepting more languages we might want a bit more consideration.

Maybe we say just top 10 languages on the internet welcome or something?

Maybe we want at least 2 native speakers to agree the sets are reasonable and not too wide?

Just thinking out loud.

[patrickhulce]

There's a fair amount of duplication with the permutations, I wonder if we could do some replacements to keep the signal in here high?

could be as simple as an easy map for now

const CHARACTER_REPLACEMENTS = new Map([
  [/í/g, 'i'],
  [/á/g, 'a'],
  [/ó/g, 'o'],
])

function normalizeText(text) {
  let normalized = text.trim().toLowerCase();
  for (const [regex, replacement] of CHARACTER_REPLACEMENTS.entries()) {
     normalized = normalized.replace(regex, replacement)
  }

  return normalized;
}
...

return BLOCKLIST.has(normalizeText(link.text));

DISCLAIMER: untested

[brendankenny]

I wonder if we could do some replacements to keep the signal in here high?

ha, the problem is with this change I would wonder if normalizeText is quite correct or if it's missing something or adding things I'm not expecting, versus just scanning a medium sized list :)

But I'd be ok with tests for it 👍

[brendankenny]

Core team: We sortof accepted the Japanese contribution without a lot of process, but if we're going to be accepting more languages we might want a bit more consideration.

yeah, considering we barely had a process for the original list of english terms, I really don't know what the best approach is here

Maybe we want at least 2 native speakers to agree the sets are reasonable and not too wide?

seems like a good idea to me

[brendankenny]

I wonder if we could do some replacements to keep the signal in here high?

ha, the problem is with this change I would wonder if normalizeText is quite correct or if it's missing something or adding things I'm not expecting, versus just scanning a medium sized list :)

But I'd be ok with tests for it 👍