Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README.md: update BuildKit/img comparison #642

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ You may be able to achieve the same default seccomp profile that Docker uses in

Similar tools include:

- [BuildKit](https://github.com/moby/buildkit)
- [img](https://github.com/genuinetools/img)
- [orca-build](https://github.com/cyphar/orca-build)
- [umoci](https://github.com/openSUSE/umoci)
Expand All @@ -454,10 +455,10 @@ Similar tools include:

All of these tools build container images with different approaches.

`img` can perform as a non root user from within a container, but requires that
the `img` container has `RawProc` access to create nested containers. `kaniko`
does not actually create nested containers, so it does not require `RawProc`
access.
BuildKit (and `img`) can perform as a non root user from within a container, but requires
seccomp and AppArmor to be disabled to create nested containers. `kaniko`
does not actually create nested containers, so it does not require seccomp and AppArmor
to be disabled.

`orca-build` depends on `runc` to build images from Dockerfiles, which can not
run inside a container (for similar reasons to `img` above). `kaniko` doesn't
Expand Down