-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use more memory efficient method of storing numbers #6
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Agreed. Anything that smells of proceduralness should be removed immediately. I'm looking at you arrays. |
Why don't we store the values within a Java Bean. Then we can persist them to a database and get all sorts of delicious metrics. Also, is this threadsafe? |
@@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ public function add(CollectionItemInterface $number) | |||
**/ | |||
public function getFirstItem() | |||
{ | |||
return $this->numbers[0]; | |||
$this->numbers->rewind(); | |||
return $this->numbers->current(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
leave a break line before return
Why not just use a hashing algorithm to store the numbers in a map, keyed by string index? |
I would recommend a hash key generator then |
Its becoming clear that we need to rearchitect the way we handle number
|
I'm thinking, that instead of a hash generator, perhaps we should architect our own NumberLinkedListNode class, and then use a doubly-linked circular linked list. This maximizes the efficiency of number operations while allowing us to effectively use the object-oriented paradigm. Thoughts? |
SplObjectStorage is better suited for what we're trying to do in NumberCollection.