lines_cop: add ENV.universal_binary audit exemption for wine

[JCount]

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your changes? Here's an example.
• Have you successfully run brew tests with your changes locally?

---

add ENV.universal_binary audit exception for wine and corresponding test coverage

[JCount]

cc @ilovezfs

[reitermarkus]

Can you make this into a proper sentence? Thanks. 😉

[JCount]

I was only matching the one above it. So, inconsistency or proper sentences?

[reitermarkus]

Ideally proper sentences for all, or specify instead of it.

[JCount]

The full fragment is: 'When auditing formula with ENV.universal_binary exempted formula' any suggestions?

[JCount]

(I am referring to the line https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/3291/files#diff-9349b511bf2b9967d30735fbb26db7b7R383)

[JCount]

@reitermarkus Is something like this what you had in mind?

[JCount]

@reitermarkus gentle ping on this

[reitermarkus]

Something like this is what I had in mind.

[JCount]

Since this has the context When auditing formulae prepended to both tests, making the wording following the it into complete sentences, would, in my mind, only serve to make things less intelligible.

[ilovezfs]

it "is as quiet as a church mouse when there is an exemption from the deprecation of ENV.universal_binary" do

[reitermarkus]

… in my mind, only serve to make things less intelligible.

It should be possible to make it more intelligible than “when auditing formulae it with a build.universal? exemption”.

Also, the context is pretty redundant, so this could actually be removed, and we'd just have it "does not report build.universal? offenses for Wine" do, which would be pretty clear to me.

[MikeMcQuaid]

Thanks @JCount!