-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keep implicit taps #1495
Keep implicit taps #1495
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tt! Good idea. Looking good so far.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks @tt! One small tweak and we should be good to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much for your great, first contribution! Without people like you submitting PRs we couldn't run this project. You rock, @tt!
I have a Brewfile that contains the following line:
Running
brew bundle cleanup --verbose
includes the following output:However, this tap can't be removed as the fomula depends on it.
Considering you can install formulae without explicitly adding a
tap
declaration, it seems that these should be respected when computing which taps to keep.This change does that: Any tap found in a
brew
declaration will automatically be kept.