xapian omega 1.4.19

[alebcay]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

As far as I can tell, the only Python dependency in xapian is for bindings. Moreover, it requires the sphinx Python module from sphinx-doc formula. Since sphinx-doc formula is now using [email protected]:

• Move xapian from [email protected] to [email protected]
• Change dependency to [:build, :test] since it's really optional at runtime

Upstream also seems to have addressed xapian/xapian#319, but looks like a flat namespace patch is also needed (the issue in the linked PR affects the bindings, but the flat namespace issue was found in the dylib itself - so the removal of the inreplace is unrelated to the flat namespace issue).

Bump omega too; xapian and omega should be bumped together it seems (or, at least it seems each omega release requires the corresponding xapian release to be present/merged).

[carlocab]

@alebcay feel free to merge this if you're happy with staying on [email protected].

[alebcay]

I plan to make the adjustment later today back to [email protected], just haven't had a chance to switch it back.

[carlocab]

Also, I just noticed that another way to solve any dependent breakage from switching to Python 3.10 might be to also build the bindings for Python 3.9 until we've migrated the dependents. But we can consider that if/when we need to.

[BrewTestBot]

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.