-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Resource Groups with "Region-less" Naming Convention? #100
Comments
@csperbeck brought this up again when reviewing one of my Azure resource deployments |
This is already supported coreutils.resource_group(, false) you'll get RG___ notice the two __ between name and env since we are not setting a region code string. Someone could submit a PR to fix that to a single _ if rgn is not set in _create_resource_group_name |
Reopening because I understand what you are talking about now. You want the package auto RG creation to support a region-less creation option. Fix inc. |
I'm defining some centralized resources (not region specific). One is for ActionGroups which use a 'Global' location. The other is for Application Insights and we're centralizing telemetry in a single region. I'd appreciate any thoughts on whether to allow resource groups to optionally include the region in the naming convention. It's supported for resources but not resource groups.
It should be possible to do this by using an expression for the rgOverride field but #93 would need to be addressed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: