Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review: Generic contracts are run only on **.testclasses.** #2716

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 30, 2018

Conversation

monperrus
Copy link
Collaborator

@monperrus monperrus commented Oct 24, 2018

and the rest will move to Jenkins, see plan in #2662

WDYT?

@monperrus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good news, by working on the tests, we find bugs!

The **.testclasses.** choice was excellent to find corner cases that did not even exist in src/main/java. See all filtered classes in MainTest.

Those cases are discarded for now, we'll look at them once we're done with this refactoring that blocks #2172.

(Still we fixed a shadow-related bug with a one-liner)

@monperrus monperrus changed the title WIP: Generic contracts are run only on **.testclasses.** review: Generic contracts are run only on **.testclasses.** Oct 27, 2018
@monperrus
Copy link
Collaborator Author

merge?

@pvojtechovsky pvojtechovsky merged commit c16bbf3 into INRIA:master Oct 30, 2018
@pvojtechovsky
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you Martin. It is interesting idea to be able to run these contracts on any model 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants